typst-agda-spec-4: Add the hydra-agda package (MAlonzo extraction) and CI gate

[noonio]

🧱 Stack (split of #2736)

1. typst-agda-spec-1: Forbid simultaneous commit and decommit in the head logic #2784 — protocol fix
2. typst-agda-spec-2: Migrate the specification prose from LaTeX to Typst #2785 — Typst prose migration
3. typst-agda-spec-3: Add the Agda formalisation of the specification #2786 — Agda formalisation + developer docs + changelog
   👉 4. typst-agda-spec-4: Add the hydra-agda package (MAlonzo extraction) and CI gate #2787 — hydra-agda package + CI
4. typst-agda-spec-5: Differentially test the node and validator against the Agda reference #2788 — agreement tests

Merge in order (1→5) into the typst-agda-stacked integration branch, then merge that branch into master as the final step.

---

Stacked PR 4/5 — splits #2736.
Base: typst-agda-spec-3 · Next: typst-agda-spec-5.

Package the decidable core of the Agda formalisation as Haskell so the node/tx
test suites can differentially test against it.

• hydra-agda: the committed MAlonzo extraction of Reference.agda /
  OffChainReference.agda plus the hand-written Hydra.Agda.* wrappers, with
  regenerate.sh.
• checks.hydra-agda-generated regenerates the extraction hermetically and
  fails on drift, so a semantic edit to the reference modules cannot leave the
  committed oracle stale.
• Exclude hydra-agda/generated from treefmt (machine-generated) and add the CI
  job that builds the spec and the extraction check.

Verified: nix build .#checks.x86_64-linux.hydra-agda-generated passes;
cabal build hydra-agda compiles; treefmt-clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

[github-actions]

End-to-end benchmark differences

Comparing this PR (new) against master (old). Numbers come from cloud VMs, so changes under 5% are shown as ≈ and are likely run-to-run noise rather than a real regression or improvement. 🟢 = improvement, 🔴 = regression; uncolored rows are neutral measures reported for context.

Sustained load (3 nodes, 3x5000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	490.52	489.89	≈ -0.63 (-0.1%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	845.51	1,078.74	🟢 +233.23 (+27.6%)
Backlog drain time (s)	29.90	26.10	🟢 -3.80 (-12.7%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.56	0.56	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg txs per snapshot	882.40	882.40	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	24.322	25.343	≈ +1.020 (+4.2%)
P50 confirmation (s)	25.776	26.680	≈ +0.904 (+3.5%)
P95 confirmation (s)	30.127	30.065	≈ -0.062 (-0.2%)
P99 confirmation (s)	30.234	30.231	≈ -0.003 (-0.0%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	8.513	10.340	🔴 +1.827 (+21.5%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	445.40	412.50	-32.90 (-7.4%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Plateau 1000 UTxO (1 node, 4000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	231.52	242.97	≈ +11.45 (+4.9%)
Backlog drain time (s)	17.20	16.40	≈ -0.80 (-4.7%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.41	0.49	+0.08 (+19.5%)
Avg txs per snapshot	571.40	500.00	-71.40 (-12.5%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	11.021	10.294	🟢 -0.727 (-6.6%)
P50 confirmation (s)	11.572	9.636	🟢 -1.936 (-16.7%)
P95 confirmation (s)	17.183	16.378	≈ -0.806 (-4.7%)
P99 confirmation (s)	17.189	16.384	≈ -0.805 (-4.7%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	6.095	5.566	🟢 -0.529 (-8.7%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	385.20	388.90	≈ +3.70 (+1.0%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Round-trip latency (3 nodes, closed-loop, 3x250 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	102.57	103.63	≈ +1.06 (+1.0%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	103.01	104.41	≈ +1.40 (+1.4%)
Backlog drain time (s)	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	69.34	70.05	≈ +0.71 (+1.0%)
Avg txs per snapshot	1.50	1.50	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	0.029	0.029	≈ -0.000 (-1.4%)
P50 confirmation (s)	0.028	0.028	≈ -0.000 (-0.7%)
P95 confirmation (s)	0.040	0.038	≈ -0.002 (-4.6%)
P99 confirmation (s)	0.045	0.043	≈ -0.002 (-4.2%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	0.007	0.007	≈ -0.000 (-2.7%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	150.10	149.40	≈ -0.70 (-0.5%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

[github-actions]

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at	2026-07-28 04:58:59.550240376 UTC
Max. memory units	14000000
Max. CPU units	10000000000
Max. tx size (kB)	16384

Script summary

Name	Hash	Size (Bytes)
νHead	f2dd4ade71e19c2310a86215aa78aea06463aca2d8b818af8dc1b8a4	12805
μHead	4abb8dedbcd6a6f03f4fe227300e2713d73b7680d47baa898b60d27a*	4971
νDeposit	c78e8c9205721eb3ef4410f3db9c6169fa6db497c24641d29c20529c	1615
νCRS	09db7ee6cf7a4b358dd5c8a2f19d2c048336ffc5a01ef35a47ca7072	2736

• The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	5476	9.22	3.03	0.49
2	5571	10.27	3.38	0.50
3	5668	10.26	3.35	0.51
5	5858	11.52	3.77	0.53
10	6340	13.92	4.53	0.57
50	10186	35.63	11.34	0.97
100	14987	62.17	19.63	1.45
114	16326	69.86	22.03	1.59

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	2322	21.15	7.52	0.48
2	2450	22.13	8.50	0.50
3	2581	22.64	9.31	0.51
5	2846	24.65	11.29	0.56
10	3499	29.98	16.32	0.66
50	8742	71.11	55.85	1.51
75	12016	98.02	80.95	2.05

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	642	18.46	6.68	0.38
2	772	19.43	7.65	0.40
3	904	20.39	8.62	0.42
5	1167	22.30	10.56	0.46
10	1821	27.12	15.43	0.56
50	7063	67.40	54.70	1.40
75	10338	92.77	79.29	1.93

Close transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	670	17.78	11.67	0.41
2	800	18.74	12.64	0.43
3	927	19.72	13.62	0.45
5	1194	21.71	15.59	0.49
10	1849	26.57	20.47	0.59
50	7094	67.93	60.14	1.44
75	10365	93.60	84.87	1.97

Contest transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	701	21.50	14.91	0.46
2	832	22.64	15.93	0.48
3	959	23.77	16.96	0.51
5	1226	26.05	19.01	0.55
10	1876	31.85	24.18	0.66
50	7126	79.43	65.70	1.58
66	9218	99.18	82.51	1.95

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.

Parties	UTxO	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
10	0	0	5644	23.29	42.87	0.90
10	1	57	5679	25.63	45.39	0.93
10	5	285	5815	35.88	55.71	1.10
10	10	569	5983	49.89	68.99	1.31
10	20	1140	6324	82.42	96.97	1.79
10	20	1137	6321	82.42	96.97	1.79

PartialFanOut transaction costs

Largest chunk of ada-only outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	569	986	34.91	66.33	0.95
25	1310	1429	68.24	99.40	1.48
30	1309	1424	68.24	99.40	1.48
40	1308	1427	68.24	99.40	1.48
50	1308	1427	68.24	99.40	1.48
100	1306	1425	68.24	99.40	1.48
150	1307	1426	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	1310	1429	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	1309	1428	68.24	99.40	1.48

PartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Largest chunk of native-token outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	1220	1719	41.97	68.90	1.06
25	2436	2698	76.59	99.22	1.60
30	2205	2452	76.56	99.17	1.59
40	2184	2434	76.59	99.17	1.59
50	2562	2831	76.56	99.27	1.61
100	2478	2743	76.59	99.22	1.61
150	2415	2677	76.59	99.22	1.60
200	2478	2743	76.59	99.22	1.61
200	2100	2347	76.56	99.12	1.59

FinalPartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Terminal partial fanout step (FanoutProgress → Final) with outputs carrying a native token. Burns all head tokens and proves accumulator exhaustion via BLS proof.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	122	5541	21.97	44.28	0.89
5	580	5916	35.70	55.84	1.10
10	1050	6281	53.78	70.59	1.37
10	1150	6380	53.78	70.62	1.37

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-07-28 04:50:17.007063933 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	196.8
P99	198.9ms
P95	198.6ms
P50	197.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	140.7
End-to-end TPS	1482.61 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	3
Snapshots per second	14.83 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	100.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	129.5
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Three local nodes

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	1025.6
P99	1039.8ms
P95	1039.3ms
P50	1025.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	557.6
End-to-end TPS	860.25 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	1.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	1.91 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	450.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	148.2
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Scenario benchmark results

This page collects results from the scenario matrix: every combination of cluster size, UTxO shape, and incremental-ops mode is exercised by CI from the latest master code and reported below.

Numbers are approximate. They come from cloud VMs rather than controlled hardware, so the useful signal is the relative change between cells and between commits, not the absolute throughput.

Generated at 2026-07-28 05:09:43.310580775 UTC

Summary across cells

TPS columns are rates (transactions per second); Wall clock (s) is the measured elapsed time from the first tx submission to the last confirmation. Times are rounded to one decimal.

Scenario	Txs	Wall clock (s)	End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	Sustained TPS (tx/s)	Avg conf (ms)	P95 conf (ms)
Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget	30	0.0	897.22	n/a	32.4	33.1
Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	174.41	175.92	5.7	7.4
Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget	30	0.0	962.92	n/a	30.3	30.9
Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	136.34	135.42	7.3	8.8
Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget	30	0.0	1084.90	n/a	26.8	27.4
Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	145.00	139.32	6.8	9.2
Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget	60	0.1	948.39	n/a	61.2	62.8
Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid	60	0.5	112.67	113.74	17.6	23.3
Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget	60	0.1	815.20	n/a	71.8	73.2
Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	82.48	80.97	24.0	30.6
Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget	60	0.1	901.52	n/a	64.3	66.1
Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	87.83	85.40	22.6	29.7
Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget	90	0.1	742.72	n/a	118.3	120.3
Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid	90	1.0	92.67	90.91	31.4	45.8
Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget	90	0.2	483.60	n/a	179.3	185.0
Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid	90	1.3	66.95	67.07	43.3	61.1
Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget	90	0.2	564.05	n/a	157.1	159.2
Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid	90	1.2	77.38	73.55	38.4	50.6

Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	32.4
P99	33.2ms
P95	33.1ms
P50	32.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	11.5
End-to-end TPS	897.22 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	59.81 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	142.8
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	5.7
P99	8.0ms
P95	7.4ms
P50	5.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	1.9
End-to-end TPS	174.41 tx/s
Sustained TPS	175.92 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	174.41 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	30.3
P99	30.9ms
P95	30.9ms
P50	30.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	11.8
End-to-end TPS	962.92 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	64.19 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	7.3
P99	8.9ms
P95	8.8ms
P50	7.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	2.0
End-to-end TPS	136.34 tx/s
Sustained TPS	135.42 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	136.34 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.7
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	26.8
P99	27.4ms
P95	27.4ms
P50	27.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	17.1
End-to-end TPS	1084.90 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	72.33 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.8
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	6.8
P99	12.2ms
P95	9.2ms
P50	6.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	2.1
End-to-end TPS	145.00 tx/s
Sustained TPS	139.32 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	145.00 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	61.2
P99	62.9ms
P95	62.8ms
P50	60.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	29.7
End-to-end TPS	948.39 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	31.61 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	17.6
P99	28.2ms
P95	23.3ms
P50	16.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	4.4
End-to-end TPS	112.67 tx/s
Sustained TPS	113.74 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	112.67 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	71.8
P99	73.3ms
P95	73.2ms
P50	72.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	26.2
End-to-end TPS	815.20 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	27.17 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.7
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	24.0
P99	34.1ms
P95	30.6ms
P50	23.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	7.2
End-to-end TPS	82.48 tx/s
Sustained TPS	80.97 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	82.48 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.8
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	64.3
P99	66.2ms
P95	66.1ms
P50	64.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	25.6
End-to-end TPS	901.52 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	30.05 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.2
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	22.6
P99	30.8ms
P95	29.7ms
P50	21.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	7.7
End-to-end TPS	87.83 tx/s
Sustained TPS	85.40 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	87.83 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	118.3
P99	120.4ms
P95	120.3ms
P50	119.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	40.8
End-to-end TPS	742.72 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	16.50 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	31.4
P99	52.5ms
P95	45.8ms
P50	30.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	7.7
End-to-end TPS	92.67 tx/s
Sustained TPS	90.91 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	63
Snapshots per second	64.87 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.4
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	179.3
P99	185.2ms
P95	185.0ms
P50	180.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	46.3
End-to-end TPS	483.60 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	10.75 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	43.3
P99	66.7ms
P95	61.1ms
P50	40.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	11.4
End-to-end TPS	66.95 tx/s
Sustained TPS	67.07 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	62
Snapshots per second	46.12 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	147.5
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	157.1
P99	159.3ms
P95	159.2ms
P50	157.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	49.7
End-to-end TPS	564.05 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	12.53 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	38.4
P99	53.5ms
P95	50.6ms
P50	38.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	9.8
End-to-end TPS	77.38 tx/s
Sustained TPS	73.55 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	61
Snapshots per second	52.45 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	147.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4