typst-agda-spec-3: Add the Agda formalisation of the specification

[noonio]

🧱 Stack (split of #2736)

1. typst-agda-spec-1: Forbid simultaneous commit and decommit in the head logic #2784 — protocol fix
2. typst-agda-spec-2: Migrate the specification prose from LaTeX to Typst #2785 — Typst prose migration
   👉 3. typst-agda-spec-3: Add the Agda formalisation of the specification #2786 — Agda formalisation + developer docs + changelog
3. typst-agda-spec-4: Add the hydra-agda package (MAlonzo extraction) and CI gate #2787 — hydra-agda package + CI
4. typst-agda-spec-5: Differentially test the node and validator against the Agda reference #2788 — agreement tests

Merge in order (1→5) into the typst-agda-stacked integration branch, then merge that branch into master as the final step.

---

Stacked PR 3/5 — splits #2736.
Base: typst-agda-spec-2 · Next: typst-agda-spec-4.

Also includes the developer docs page for the Agda formalisation (docs/dev/agda.md), the specification docs + sidebar updates, and the spec-migration changelog entry (absorbed from the former docs PR #2789).

Populate the literate sources with their Agda content and machine-check them as
part of the spec build. This PR is the formalisation half of the migration:
it re-inserts exactly the Agda code blocks that PR 2 held back, so the two PRs
together reproduce the full literate tree.

• Re-add the Agda code blocks to the .lagda.typ tree (datum/redeemer types,
  transition relations, validity bundles, coverage/safety and security theorems
  and proofs); they now render in the formalisation appendix.
• Add the standalone reference modules (Prelude, Reference,
  ReferenceBridge, OffChainReference, RefReflection).
• build.sh now typechecks the tree with Agda before rendering and runs the
  Agda↔Typst reference lint (check-refs.sh) and the trust-ledger drift check
  (check-trust-ledger.sh); the Agda toolchain is wired into the build and dev
  shell.

Verified: nix build .#spec runs the full Agda typecheck + lints and renders the
61-page PDF; treefmt-clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

[github-actions]

End-to-end benchmark differences

Comparing this PR (new) against master (old). Numbers come from cloud VMs, so changes under 5% are shown as ≈ and are likely run-to-run noise rather than a real regression or improvement. 🟢 = improvement, 🔴 = regression; uncolored rows are neutral measures reported for context.

Sustained load (3 nodes, 3x5000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	489.23	481.36	≈ -7.87 (-1.6%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	927.05	946.93	≈ +19.88 (+2.1%)
Backlog drain time (s)	29.90	30.20	≈ +0.30 (+1.0%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.55	0.55	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg txs per snapshot	882.40	882.40	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	24.566	24.883	≈ +0.317 (+1.3%)
P50 confirmation (s)	26.051	26.448	≈ +0.397 (+1.5%)
P95 confirmation (s)	29.907	30.389	≈ +0.482 (+1.6%)
P99 confirmation (s)	30.116	30.625	≈ +0.509 (+1.7%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	8.024	8.145	≈ +0.121 (+1.5%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	427.80	409.40	≈ -18.40 (-4.3%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Plateau 1000 UTxO (1 node, 4000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	240.82	229.77	≈ -11.05 (-4.6%)
Backlog drain time (s)	16.50	17.30	≈ +0.80 (+4.8%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.60	0.40	-0.20 (-33.3%)
Avg txs per snapshot	400.00	571.40	+171.40 (+42.8%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	9.697	11.052	🔴 +1.355 (+14.0%)
P50 confirmation (s)	10.305	11.291	🔴 +0.987 (+9.6%)
P95 confirmation (s)	16.493	17.310	≈ +0.817 (+5.0%)
P99 confirmation (s)	16.495	17.311	≈ +0.816 (+4.9%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	5.616	6.216	🔴 +0.600 (+10.7%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	329.20	382.40	+53.20 (+16.2%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Round-trip latency (3 nodes, closed-loop, 3x250 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	107.46	100.55	🔴 -6.91 (-6.4%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	107.79	100.85	🔴 -6.94 (-6.4%)
Backlog drain time (s)	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	72.21	67.97	-4.24 (-5.9%)
Avg txs per snapshot	1.50	1.50	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	0.028	0.030	🔴 +0.002 (+6.5%)
P50 confirmation (s)	0.027	0.029	🔴 +0.002 (+7.0%)
P95 confirmation (s)	0.036	0.039	🔴 +0.003 (+9.1%)
P99 confirmation (s)	0.041	0.043	🔴 +0.002 (+5.3%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	0.007	0.008	🔴 +0.000 (+6.9%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	149.60	149.10	≈ -0.50 (-0.3%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

[github-actions]

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at	2026-07-28 04:59:26.143934088 UTC
Max. memory units	14000000
Max. CPU units	10000000000
Max. tx size (kB)	16384

Script summary

Name	Hash	Size (Bytes)
νHead	f2dd4ade71e19c2310a86215aa78aea06463aca2d8b818af8dc1b8a4	12805
μHead	4abb8dedbcd6a6f03f4fe227300e2713d73b7680d47baa898b60d27a*	4971
νDeposit	c78e8c9205721eb3ef4410f3db9c6169fa6db497c24641d29c20529c	1615
νCRS	09db7ee6cf7a4b358dd5c8a2f19d2c048336ffc5a01ef35a47ca7072	2736

• The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	5475	9.33	3.06	0.49
2	5571	10.02	3.29	0.50
3	5667	10.15	3.32	0.51
5	5860	11.16	3.64	0.52
10	6340	14.06	4.58	0.58
50	10180	35.59	11.33	0.97
100	14982	61.99	19.57	1.45
114	16326	69.36	21.87	1.59

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	2321	21.24	7.55	0.48
2	2452	22.19	8.52	0.50
3	2583	23.30	9.54	0.52
5	2846	25.22	11.48	0.56
10	3501	29.65	16.21	0.66
50	8741	71.41	55.94	1.52
75	12015	96.99	80.60	2.04

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	642	18.46	6.68	0.38
2	777	19.43	7.65	0.40
3	904	20.37	8.62	0.42
5	1167	22.31	10.57	0.46
10	1825	27.16	15.44	0.56
50	7063	67.90	54.84	1.40
75	10337	93.55	79.51	1.93

Close transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	666	17.78	11.67	0.41
2	800	18.76	12.65	0.43
3	931	19.69	13.61	0.45
10	1849	26.62	20.49	0.59
50	7086	67.30	59.96	1.44
75	10362	93.98	84.98	1.98

Contest transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	700	21.50	14.91	0.46
2	832	22.64	15.93	0.48
3	959	23.79	16.96	0.51
5	1226	26.09	19.02	0.55
10	1881	31.79	24.16	0.66
50	7121	80.27	65.94	1.59
67	9348	99.93	83.43	1.97

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.

Parties	UTxO	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
10	0	0	5645	23.29	42.87	0.90
10	1	57	5678	25.63	45.39	0.93
10	5	283	5812	35.88	55.71	1.10
10	10	567	5982	49.89	68.99	1.31
10	20	1138	6322	82.42	96.97	1.79
10	20	1138	6322	82.42	96.97	1.79

PartialFanOut transaction costs

Largest chunk of ada-only outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	567	984	34.91	66.33	0.95
25	1310	1425	68.24	99.40	1.48
30	1311	1430	68.24	99.40	1.48
40	1308	1427	68.24	99.40	1.48
50	1312	1431	68.24	99.40	1.48
100	1307	1426	68.24	99.40	1.48
150	1308	1423	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	1311	1430	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	1307	1426	68.24	99.40	1.48

PartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Largest chunk of native-token outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	1080	1565	42.00	68.86	1.05
25	2037	2276	76.59	99.12	1.58
30	2142	2390	76.59	99.17	1.59
40	2436	2698	76.56	99.22	1.60
50	2331	2589	76.59	99.22	1.60
100	2415	2677	76.56	99.22	1.60
150	2184	2431	76.59	99.17	1.59
200	2163	2413	76.56	99.16	1.59
200	2247	2501	76.59	99.17	1.59

FinalPartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Terminal partial fanout step (FanoutProgress → Final) with outputs carrying a native token. Burns all head tokens and proves accumulator exhaustion via BLS proof.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	108	5528	22.10	44.31	0.89
5	485	5820	35.70	55.82	1.10
10	1020	6250	53.90	70.62	1.37
10	1060	6290	53.78	70.59	1.37

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-07-28 05:01:44.775227373 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	188.6
P99	193.2ms
P95	192.7ms
P50	188.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	120.7
End-to-end TPS	1508.87 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	3
Snapshots per second	15.09 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	100.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.6
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Three local nodes

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	979.6
P99	1039.0ms
P95	1037.8ms
P50	1009.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	470.7
End-to-end TPS	858.77 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	1.0
Snapshots observed	3
Snapshots per second	2.86 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	300.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	147.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Scenario benchmark results

This page collects results from the scenario matrix: every combination of cluster size, UTxO shape, and incremental-ops mode is exercised by CI from the latest master code and reported below.

Numbers are approximate. They come from cloud VMs rather than controlled hardware, so the useful signal is the relative change between cells and between commits, not the absolute throughput.

Generated at 2026-07-28 05:01:51.317068085 UTC

Summary across cells

TPS columns are rates (transactions per second); Wall clock (s) is the measured elapsed time from the first tx submission to the last confirmation. Times are rounded to one decimal.

Scenario	Txs	Wall clock (s)	End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	Sustained TPS (tx/s)	Avg conf (ms)	P95 conf (ms)
Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget	30	0.0	1063.89	n/a	27.5	27.9
Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	173.80	171.53	5.7	6.9
Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget	30	0.0	849.79	n/a	34.4	35.0
Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	132.35	130.36	7.5	11.3
Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget	30	0.0	851.00	n/a	34.3	35.0
Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	136.77	131.37	7.2	10.3
Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget	60	0.1	871.50	n/a	67.5	68.3
Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid	60	0.5	124.94	127.78	15.7	20.1
Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget	60	0.1	712.29	n/a	82.0	83.7
Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	81.41	80.41	24.3	30.9
Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget	60	0.1	757.32	n/a	76.9	78.2
Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	82.49	78.08	24.0	31.5
Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget	90	0.1	614.42	n/a	140.9	145.2
Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid	90	1.0	89.44	90.09	33.0	43.7
Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget	90	0.2	479.57	n/a	181.7	185.2
Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid	90	1.5	61.01	61.80	48.0	64.2
Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget	90	0.2	538.22	n/a	162.5	166.9
Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid	90	1.2	74.99	71.94	39.2	52.3

Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	27.5
P99	27.9ms
P95	27.9ms
P50	27.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	14.4
End-to-end TPS	1063.89 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	70.93 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	5.7
P99	11.2ms
P95	6.9ms
P50	5.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	1.8
End-to-end TPS	173.80 tx/s
Sustained TPS	171.53 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	173.80 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	142.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	34.4
P99	35.0ms
P95	35.0ms
P50	34.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	13.8
End-to-end TPS	849.79 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	56.65 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	7.5
P99	13.3ms
P95	11.3ms
P50	6.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	2.0
End-to-end TPS	132.35 tx/s
Sustained TPS	130.36 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	132.35 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.6
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	34.3
P99	35.0ms
P95	35.0ms
P50	34.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	14.0
End-to-end TPS	851.00 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	56.73 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	7.2
P99	11.5ms
P95	10.3ms
P50	6.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	2.1
End-to-end TPS	136.77 tx/s
Sustained TPS	131.37 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	136.77 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	67.5
P99	68.4ms
P95	68.3ms
P50	67.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	29.6
End-to-end TPS	871.50 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	29.05 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	15.7
P99	24.6ms
P95	20.1ms
P50	15.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	4.8
End-to-end TPS	124.94 tx/s
Sustained TPS	127.78 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	124.94 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	82.0
P99	83.7ms
P95	83.7ms
P50	82.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	28.4
End-to-end TPS	712.29 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	23.74 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	24.3
P99	34.1ms
P95	30.9ms
P50	24.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	7.8
End-to-end TPS	81.41 tx/s
Sustained TPS	80.41 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	81.41 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	76.9
P99	78.3ms
P95	78.2ms
P50	77.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	36.7
End-to-end TPS	757.32 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	25.24 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.2
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	24.0
P99	34.2ms
P95	31.5ms
P50	23.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	7.3
End-to-end TPS	82.49 tx/s
Sustained TPS	78.08 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	82.49 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.7
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	140.9
P99	145.3ms
P95	145.2ms
P50	142.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	46.5
End-to-end TPS	614.42 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	13.65 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	33.0
P99	47.1ms
P95	43.7ms
P50	32.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	9.2
End-to-end TPS	89.44 tx/s
Sustained TPS	90.09 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	61
Snapshots per second	60.62 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	181.7
P99	185.5ms
P95	185.2ms
P50	183.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	67.2
End-to-end TPS	479.57 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	10.66 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	48.0
P99	65.8ms
P95	64.2ms
P50	48.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	12.2
End-to-end TPS	61.01 tx/s
Sustained TPS	61.80 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	62
Snapshots per second	42.03 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	162.5
P99	167.0ms
P95	166.9ms
P50	164.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	55.8
End-to-end TPS	538.22 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	11.96 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	39.2
P99	56.1ms
P95	52.3ms
P50	39.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	11.0
End-to-end TPS	74.99 tx/s
Sustained TPS	71.94 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	62
Snapshots per second	51.66 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	147.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4