typst-agda-spec-2: Migrate the specification prose from LaTeX to Typst

[noonio]

🧱 Stack (split of #2736)

1. typst-agda-spec-1: Forbid simultaneous commit and decommit in the head logic #2784 — protocol fix
   👉 2. typst-agda-spec-2: Migrate the specification prose from LaTeX to Typst #2785 — Typst prose migration
2. typst-agda-spec-3: Add the Agda formalisation of the specification #2786 — Agda formalisation + developer docs + changelog
3. typst-agda-spec-4: Add the hydra-agda package (MAlonzo extraction) and CI gate #2787 — hydra-agda package + CI
4. typst-agda-spec-5: Differentially test the node and validator against the Agda reference #2788 — agreement tests

Merge in order (1→5) into the typst-agda-stacked integration branch, then merge that branch into master as the final step.

---

Stacked PR 2/5 — splits #2736.
Base: typst-agda-spec-1 · Next: typst-agda-spec-3.

Replace the LaTeX/TikZ/SVG spec sources with a literate-Typst tree rendered by
Typst. Prose only here — the Agda code blocks and the Agda typecheck stage
are added in PR 3, so this PR reviews as a document migration with no Agda.

• Prose, notation macros, and native cetz/fletcher diagrams replace the .tex
  sources, TikZ/SVG figures, and the stripped JuliaMono fonts.
• build.sh renders the .lagda.typ tree with Typst (+ tooltip postprocess);
  the Shakefile/LaTeX toolchain is removed.
• The @preview diagram packages (cetz, fletcher, oxifmt) are supplied at
  pinned versions from nixpkgs via typst.withPackages
  (TYPST_PACKAGE_CACHE_PATH), so the build stays hermetic without vendoring
  ~15k lines into the repo (a deliberate change from Revise spec to be in Typst + Add some agda #2736, which vendored
  spec/typst-packages).

The formalisation appendix is intentionally empty until PR 3.

Verified: nix build .#spec renders the 55-page PDF; treefmt-clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

[github-actions]

End-to-end benchmark differences

Comparing this PR (new) against master (old). Numbers come from cloud VMs, so changes under 5% are shown as ≈ and are likely run-to-run noise rather than a real regression or improvement. 🟢 = improvement, 🔴 = regression; uncolored rows are neutral measures reported for context.

Sustained load (3 nodes, 3x5000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	495.39	588.13	🟢 +92.74 (+18.7%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	1,049.44	1,284.62	🟢 +235.18 (+22.4%)
Backlog drain time (s)	29.40	24.80	🟢 -4.60 (-15.6%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.56	0.67	+0.11 (+19.6%)
Avg txs per snapshot	882.40	882.40	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	24.707	21.101	🟢 -3.606 (-14.6%)
P50 confirmation (s)	25.961	22.014	🟢 -3.947 (-15.2%)
P95 confirmation (s)	29.463	25.017	🟢 -4.447 (-15.1%)
P99 confirmation (s)	29.549	25.110	🟢 -4.439 (-15.0%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	9.186	10.196	🔴 +1.010 (+11.0%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	419.50	425.40	≈ +5.90 (+1.4%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Plateau 1000 UTxO (1 node, 4000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	237.13	265.38	🟢 +28.25 (+11.9%)
Backlog drain time (s)	16.80	14.80	🟢 -2.00 (-11.9%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.47	0.46	≈ -0.01 (-2.1%)
Avg txs per snapshot	500.00	571.40	+71.40 (+14.3%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	10.900	9.942	🟢 -0.958 (-8.8%)
P50 confirmation (s)	9.486	11.393	🔴 +1.907 (+20.1%)
P95 confirmation (s)	16.685	14.845	🟢 -1.840 (-11.0%)
P99 confirmation (s)	16.687	14.846	🟢 -1.842 (-11.0%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	5.270	4.696	🟢 -0.575 (-10.9%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	394.30	379.60	≈ -14.70 (-3.7%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Round-trip latency (3 nodes, closed-loop, 3x250 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	99.51	101.92	≈ +2.41 (+2.4%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	99.07	100.12	≈ +1.05 (+1.1%)
Backlog drain time (s)	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	67.00	69.44	≈ +2.44 (+3.6%)
Avg txs per snapshot	1.50	1.50	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	0.030	0.029	≈ -0.001 (-3.0%)
P50 confirmation (s)	0.029	0.027	🟢 -0.002 (-8.0%)
P95 confirmation (s)	0.040	0.044	🔴 +0.004 (+10.6%)
P99 confirmation (s)	0.048	0.088	🔴 +0.040 (+84.1%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	0.008	0.006	🟢 -0.002 (-19.0%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	151.40	150.10	≈ -1.30 (-0.9%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

[github-actions]

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at	2026-07-28 04:48:28.343225101 UTC
Max. memory units	14000000
Max. CPU units	10000000000
Max. tx size (kB)	16384

Script summary

Name	Hash	Size (Bytes)
νHead	f2dd4ade71e19c2310a86215aa78aea06463aca2d8b818af8dc1b8a4	12805
μHead	4abb8dedbcd6a6f03f4fe227300e2713d73b7680d47baa898b60d27a*	4971
νDeposit	c78e8c9205721eb3ef4410f3db9c6169fa6db497c24641d29c20529c	1615
νCRS	09db7ee6cf7a4b358dd5c8a2f19d2c048336ffc5a01ef35a47ca7072	2736

• The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	5475	9.32	3.06	0.49
2	5571	9.86	3.23	0.50
3	5668	10.15	3.32	0.51
5	5860	11.36	3.71	0.53
10	6341	14.02	4.57	0.58
50	10182	35.49	11.28	0.97
100	14980	62.13	19.60	1.45
114	16324	69.73	21.98	1.59

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	2321	20.59	7.33	0.47
2	2452	21.63	8.33	0.49
3	2586	22.64	9.31	0.51
5	2850	24.69	11.30	0.56
10	3501	29.93	16.31	0.66
50	8740	72.31	56.23	1.52
75	12021	97.78	80.85	2.05

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	646	18.46	6.68	0.38
2	772	19.42	7.65	0.40
3	904	20.35	8.61	0.42
5	1171	22.30	10.56	0.46
10	1822	27.16	15.44	0.56
50	7063	67.80	54.81	1.40
75	10338	93.17	79.40	1.93

Close transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
2	800	18.76	12.65	0.43
3	932	19.74	13.63	0.45
10	1849	26.44	20.44	0.59
50	7090	67.47	60.01	1.44
75	10365	93.44	84.83	1.97

Contest transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	701	21.48	14.90	0.46
2	827	22.62	15.93	0.48
3	964	23.81	16.97	0.51
5	1225	26.07	19.02	0.55
10	1880	31.85	24.18	0.66
50	7118	79.67	65.77	1.58
66	9209	98.78	82.40	1.95

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.

Parties	UTxO	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
10	0	0	5644	23.29	42.87	0.90
10	1	57	5678	25.63	45.39	0.93
10	5	285	5814	35.88	55.71	1.10
10	10	568	5983	49.89	68.99	1.31
10	20	1137	6321	82.42	96.97	1.79
10	20	1140	6324	82.42	96.97	1.79

PartialFanOut transaction costs

Largest chunk of ada-only outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	570	987	34.91	66.33	0.95
25	1311	1430	68.24	99.40	1.48
30	1309	1428	68.24	99.40	1.48
40	1307	1426	68.24	99.40	1.48
50	1310	1429	68.24	99.40	1.48
100	1307	1426	68.24	99.40	1.48
150	1310	1429	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	1309	1428	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	1309	1428	68.24	99.40	1.48

PartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Largest chunk of native-token outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	1080	1565	42.00	68.86	1.05
25	2247	2500	76.59	99.17	1.59
30	2583	2852	76.56	99.27	1.61
40	2478	2742	76.59	99.22	1.61
50	2142	2391	76.56	99.16	1.59
100	2562	2831	76.59	99.27	1.61
150	2310	2567	76.56	99.21	1.60
200	2079	2325	76.59	99.12	1.59
200	2163	2413	76.59	99.17	1.59

FinalPartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Terminal partial fanout step (FanoutProgress → Final) with outputs carrying a native token. Burns all head tokens and proves accumulator exhaustion via BLS proof.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	108	5527	22.10	44.31	0.89
5	535	5870	35.70	55.83	1.10
10	1230	6460	53.78	70.64	1.38
10	1200	6430	53.90	70.67	1.38

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-07-28 05:01:52.309071617 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	204.3
P99	209.0ms
P95	208.5ms
P50	204.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	122.7
End-to-end TPS	1399.62 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	3
Snapshots per second	14.00 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	100.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.6
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Three local nodes

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	980.1
P99	1047.2ms
P95	1046.3ms
P50	996.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	495.7
End-to-end TPS	854.91 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	1.0
Snapshots observed	3
Snapshots per second	2.85 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	300.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	147.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Scenario benchmark results

This page collects results from the scenario matrix: every combination of cluster size, UTxO shape, and incremental-ops mode is exercised by CI from the latest master code and reported below.

Numbers are approximate. They come from cloud VMs rather than controlled hardware, so the useful signal is the relative change between cells and between commits, not the absolute throughput.

Generated at 2026-07-28 05:06:46.739009398 UTC

Summary across cells

TPS columns are rates (transactions per second); Wall clock (s) is the measured elapsed time from the first tx submission to the last confirmation. Times are rounded to one decimal.

Scenario	Txs	Wall clock (s)	End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	Sustained TPS (tx/s)	Avg conf (ms)	P95 conf (ms)
Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget	30	0.0	1194.49	n/a	24.3	24.8
Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	182.44	184.17	5.4	6.4
Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget	30	0.0	955.19	n/a	30.4	31.1
Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	127.40	125.75	7.8	11.3
Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget	30	0.0	977.42	n/a	29.9	30.4
Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	132.01	134.08	7.5	11.0
Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget	60	0.1	874.06	n/a	66.9	67.6
Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid	60	0.5	124.15	124.40	15.9	21.2
Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget	60	0.1	670.04	n/a	87.3	89.0
Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	85.69	85.85	23.0	31.3
Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget	60	0.1	756.90	n/a	76.8	78.9
Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	89.58	87.12	22.1	27.2
Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget	90	0.1	721.90	n/a	121.8	124.4
Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid	90	0.9	98.53	99.50	30.1	38.9
Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget	90	0.2	524.28	n/a	166.3	171.3
Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid	90	1.3	68.79	68.60	42.8	54.7
Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget	90	0.2	507.81	n/a	172.7	176.9
Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid	90	1.2	76.29	73.64	38.7	50.2

Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	24.3
P99	24.9ms
P95	24.8ms
P50	24.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	9.4
End-to-end TPS	1194.49 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	79.63 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.8
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	5.4
P99	6.9ms
P95	6.4ms
P50	5.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	1.9
End-to-end TPS	182.44 tx/s
Sustained TPS	184.17 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	182.44 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	30.4
P99	31.2ms
P95	31.1ms
P50	30.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	11.5
End-to-end TPS	955.19 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	63.68 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	7.8
P99	12.1ms
P95	11.3ms
P50	7.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	2.1
End-to-end TPS	127.40 tx/s
Sustained TPS	125.75 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	127.40 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.7
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	29.9
P99	30.5ms
P95	30.4ms
P50	30.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	12.7
End-to-end TPS	977.42 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	65.16 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	7.5
P99	11.4ms
P95	11.0ms
P50	7.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	2.1
End-to-end TPS	132.01 tx/s
Sustained TPS	134.08 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	132.01 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	66.9
P99	67.7ms
P95	67.6ms
P50	67.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	23.1
End-to-end TPS	874.06 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	29.14 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.2
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	15.9
P99	21.8ms
P95	21.2ms
P50	15.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	4.9
End-to-end TPS	124.15 tx/s
Sustained TPS	124.40 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	124.15 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	87.3
P99	89.1ms
P95	89.0ms
P50	87.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	25.3
End-to-end TPS	670.04 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	22.33 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.8
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	23.0
P99	32.9ms
P95	31.3ms
P50	23.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	6.7
End-to-end TPS	85.69 tx/s
Sustained TPS	85.85 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	85.69 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.8
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	76.8
P99	79.0ms
P95	78.9ms
P50	77.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	28.3
End-to-end TPS	756.90 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	25.23 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	22.1
P99	29.8ms
P95	27.2ms
P50	22.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	6.2
End-to-end TPS	89.58 tx/s
Sustained TPS	87.12 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	89.58 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.7
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	121.8
P99	124.5ms
P95	124.4ms
P50	122.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	55.9
End-to-end TPS	721.90 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	16.04 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.9
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	30.1
P99	42.2ms
P95	38.9ms
P50	29.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	8.1
End-to-end TPS	98.53 tx/s
Sustained TPS	99.50 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	65.69 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.6
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	166.3
P99	171.4ms
P95	171.3ms
P50	166.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	51.2
End-to-end TPS	524.28 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	11.65 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.6
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	42.8
P99	66.5ms
P95	54.7ms
P50	42.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	10.9
End-to-end TPS	68.79 tx/s
Sustained TPS	68.60 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	62
Snapshots per second	47.39 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	147.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	172.7
P99	177.0ms
P95	176.9ms
P50	174.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	46.8
End-to-end TPS	507.81 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	11.28 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	38.7
P99	63.8ms
P95	50.2ms
P50	37.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	10.0
End-to-end TPS	76.29 tx/s
Sustained TPS	73.64 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	62
Snapshots per second	52.55 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4