Skip to content

Fix grammar in FAQ#12687

Open
webgo-oss wants to merge 1 commit into
whatwg:mainfrom
webgo-oss:grammar
Open

Fix grammar in FAQ#12687
webgo-oss wants to merge 1 commit into
whatwg:mainfrom
webgo-oss:grammar

Conversation

@webgo-oss

@webgo-oss webgo-oss commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

This pull request fixes a couple of minor language issues in the FAQ.

Changes

  • Fixed a grammatical error:

    • take the time documenttake the time to document

This change improve readability without changing the meaning of the content.

Comment thread FAQ.md
Browsers do not implement HTML+, HTML2, HTML3.2, HTML4, HTML4.01, etc, as separate versions. They all just have a single implementation that covers all these versions at once. That is what the HTML Standard defines: how to write a browser (or other implementation) that handles _all previous versions of HTML_, as well as all the latest features.

One of the main goals of the HTML Standard and the WHATWG effort as a whole is to make it possible for archeologists hundreds of years from now to write a browser and view HTML content, regardless of when it was written. Making sure that we handle all documents is one of our most important goals. Not having versions does not preclude this; indeed it makes it significantly easier.
One of the main goals of the HTML Standard and the WHATWG effort as a whole is to make it possible for archaeologists hundreds of years from now to write a browser and view HTML content, regardless of when it was written. Making sure that we handle all documents is one of our most important goals. Not having versions does not preclude this; indeed it makes it significantly easier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think "archeologists" is fine in en-US. I suggest we keep this one as-is.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the clarification! I agree. I'll keep “archeologists” as-is and retain only the grammar correction.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to confirm: yes, American English allows both spellings; archaeologists and archeologists.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants