fix: remove redundant path sanitize

[wellwelwel]

As the title says 🤓

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.71%. Comparing base (40ccd6c) to head (69aec7b).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1141   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.71%   99.71%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        3560     3560           
  Branches      568      568           
=======================================
  Hits         3550     3550           
- Misses          1        2    +1     
+ Partials        9        8    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
linux	98.90% <100.00%> (ø)
osx	98.90% <100.00%> (ø)
windows	95.84% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[wellwelwel-bot]

🎖️ Benchmarks

• 69aec7b

	🐷 Poku	🃏 Jest	⚡️ Vitest	🦕 Deno	🐢 Node.js	🍞 Bun
🏃🏻‍♀️ Test Runner	$\textsf{0.177s}$ ${\color{gray}\textsf{(baseline)}}$	$\textsf{0.919s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+742ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.782s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+605ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.372s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+195ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.212s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+35ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.095s}$ ${\color{green}\textsf{(-82ms)}}$
🧬 No Isolation	$\textsf{0.055s}$ ${\color{gray}\textsf{(baseline)}}$	$\textsf{0.947s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+892ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.577s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+522ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.376s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+321ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.062s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+7ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.032s}$ ${\color{green}\textsf{(-23ms)}}$
🧪 Assertion	$\textsf{0.095s}$ ${\color{gray}\textsf{(baseline)}}$	$\textsf{0.568s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+473ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.495s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+400ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.799s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+704ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.104s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+9ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.013s}$ ${\color{green}\textsf{(-82ms)}}$
🔗 Nesting	$\textsf{0.147s}$ ${\color{gray}\textsf{(baseline)}}$	$\textsf{0.829s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+682ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.774s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+627ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.444s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+297ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.535s}$ ${\color{red}\textsf{(+388ms)}}$	$\textsf{0.043s}$ ${\color{green}\textsf{(-104ms)}}$

ℹ Extensive Details

🖥️ Setup

• OS: linux x64
• CPU: AMD EPYC 9V74 80-Core Processor (4 cores)
• RAM: 15.61 GB

---

🏃🏻‍♀️ Test Runner

Focuses solely in execution, using a simple assert(true) or assert(false) from Node.js and searches for files in four levels of depth.

• success: a suite of 5 tests that will pass.
• failure: a suite of 5 tests that will fail.
• balanced: a suite of 10 tests where 5 tests will fail and 5 tests will pass.

---

🃏 Jest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.19 ± 0.10 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/execution/success/jest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.02 ± 0.08 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/execution/failure/jest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.29 ± 0.08 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/execution/balanced/jest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

⚡️ Vitest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    4.43 ± 0.10 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/execution/success/vitest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    4.18 ± 0.08 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/execution/failure/vitest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    4.52 ± 0.12 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/execution/balanced/vitest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

🐢 Node.js (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.11 ± 0.02 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/execution/success/node/**/**.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.13 ± 0.04 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/execution/failure/node/**/**.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.32 ± 0.03 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/execution/balanced/node/**/**.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

🍞 Bun (built-in)

• success

  bun ran
    1.74 ± 0.09 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/execution/success/bun"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  bun ran
    1.71 ± 0.08 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/execution/failure/bun"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  bun ran
    1.74 ± 0.05 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/execution/balanced/bun"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

🦕 Deno (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.71 ± 0.02 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/execution/success/deno"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.28 ± 0.05 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/execution/failure/deno"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    2.01 ± 0.03 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/execution/balanced/deno"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

🚀 No Isolation

Same fixtures as Test Runner, but with test isolation disabled where supported (Poku --isolation=none, Jest --runInBand, Vitest --no-isolate, Node.js --test-isolation=none, Bun plain bun test). Deno has no per-file isolation flag, so it stays on deno test.

• success: a suite of 5 tests that will pass.
• failure: a suite of 5 tests that will fail.
• balanced: a suite of 10 tests where 5 tests will fail and 5 tests will pass.

---

🃏 Jest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
   15.65 ± 0.71 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js --runInBand "./test/execution/success/jest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
   15.41 ± 0.70 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js --runInBand "./test/execution/failure/jest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
   20.49 ± 2.13 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js --runInBand "./test/execution/balanced/jest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

⚡️ Vitest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
   11.21 ± 0.50 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --no-isolate "./test/execution/success/vitest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
   10.73 ± 0.38 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --no-isolate "./test/execution/failure/vitest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
   10.40 ± 0.29 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --no-isolate "./test/execution/balanced/vitest"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

🐢 Node.js (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.09 ± 0.06 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test --test-isolation=none "./test/execution/success/node/**/**.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.13 ± 0.04 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test --test-isolation=none "./test/execution/failure/node/**/**.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.18 ± 0.07 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test --test-isolation=none "./test/execution/balanced/node/**/**.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

🍞 Bun (built-in)

• success

  bun ran
    1.51 ± 0.03 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test "./test/execution/success/bun"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  bun ran
    1.50 ± 0.02 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test "./test/execution/failure/bun"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  bun ran
    1.40 ± 0.06 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test "./test/execution/balanced/bun"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

---

🦕 Deno (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.43 ± 0.17 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/execution/success/deno"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/success/poku"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    4.07 ± 0.11 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/execution/failure/deno"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/failure/poku"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    8.64 ± 0.30 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/execution/balanced/deno"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js --isolation=none "./test/execution/balanced/poku"

🧪 Assertion

Focuses solely in assertions, using each runner's own assertion API with 1 test file per runner per scenario (no file discovery involved).

• success: 1.000 iterations × 3 assertion types (ok, strictEqual, deepStrictEqual), all passing.
• failure: a suite of 3 tests, one per assertion type, all failing.
• balanced: a suite of 6 tests where 3 tests will fail and 3 tests will pass.

Note: Jest, Vitest, Bun, Deno, and Node.js assertion libraries are not independently executable and require their own runtime environments. Consequently, results include the runner's startup and harness overhead in addition to assertion execution cost.

---

🃏 Jest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    6.53 ± 0.15 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/assertion/success/jest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.45 ± 0.18 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/assertion/failure/jest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    6.02 ± 0.14 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/assertion/balanced/jest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

⚡️ Vitest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.44 ± 0.11 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/assertion/success/vitest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.03 ± 0.12 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/assertion/failure/vitest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.17 ± 0.15 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/assertion/balanced/vitest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

🐢 Node.js (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.06 ± 0.03 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/assertion/success/node.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.10 ± 0.03 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/assertion/failure/node.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    1.11 ± 0.06 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/assertion/balanced/node.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

🍞 Bun (built-in)

• success

  bun ran
    6.54 ± 0.15 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/assertion/success/bun.spec.js"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  bun ran
    7.24 ± 0.39 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/assertion/failure/bun.spec.js"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  bun ran
    7.02 ± 0.10 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/assertion/balanced/bun.spec.js"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

🦕 Deno (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    7.08 ± 0.13 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/assertion/success/deno.test.js"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    6.93 ± 0.11 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/assertion/failure/deno.test.js"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    6.94 ± 0.08 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/assertion/balanced/deno.test.js"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/assertion/balanced/poku.spec.js"

🔗 Nesting

Focuses on nested test suite overhead using describe blocks (3 levels deep, 100 suites), using Node.js assert for all runners.

• success: 100 suites × 3-level deep nesting, all passing.
• failure: 100 suites × 3-level deep nesting, all failing.
• balanced: 50 suites passing + 50 suites failing.

---

🃏 Jest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.75 ± 0.12 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/nesting/success/jest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.38 ± 0.18 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/nesting/failure/jest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.94 ± 0.36 times faster than jest

See commands

source	node --experimental-vm-modules ./node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js "./test/nesting/balanced/jest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

⚡️ Vitest

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.23 ± 0.22 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/nesting/success/vitest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.28 ± 0.23 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/nesting/failure/vitest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    5.48 ± 0.33 times faster than vitest

See commands

source	node ./node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run "./test/nesting/balanced/vitest.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

🐢 Node.js (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    3.25 ± 0.20 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/nesting/success/node.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    3.92 ± 0.16 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/nesting/failure/node.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    3.59 ± 0.13 times faster than node

See commands

source	node --test "./test/nesting/balanced/node.spec.js"
poku	node ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

🍞 Bun (built-in)

• success

  bun ran
    3.00 ± 0.06 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/nesting/success/bun.spec.js"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  bun ran
    2.53 ± 0.13 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/nesting/failure/bun.spec.js"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  bun ran
    2.76 ± 0.10 times faster than 🐷 Poku (69aec7b)

See commands

source	bun test --parallel --isolate "./test/nesting/balanced/bun.spec.js"
poku	bun --bun ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/balanced/poku.spec.js"

---

🦕 Deno (built-in)

• success

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    2.55 ± 0.10 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/nesting/success/deno.test.js"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/success/poku.spec.js"

• failure

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    2.35 ± 0.09 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/nesting/failure/deno.test.js"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/failure/poku.spec.js"

• balanced

  🐷 Poku (69aec7b) ran
    2.42 ± 0.08 times faster than deno

See commands

source	deno test "./test/nesting/balanced/deno.test.js"
poku	deno run --allow-all ./node_modules/poku/lib/bin/index.js "./test/nesting/balanced/poku.spec.js"