feat(retool): add local thread pool execution mode for tool calls#69
feat(retool): add local thread pool execution mode for tool calls#69xiaohong42 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the tool execution capabilities by introducing a local thread pool execution mode as an alternative to the existing Ray-based system. This change provides greater flexibility in how tools are run, allowing for execution without a full Ray setup. The core logic now dynamically switches between execution backends based on a new configuration parameter, and tool results are standardized using a dedicated Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new local thread pool execution mode for tool calls, which is a valuable addition for environments where Ray might not be suitable. The implementation correctly uses run_in_executor for running blocking code in an async context. However, a significant issue has been identified: the use of a blocking semaphore within an async function. This will block the event loop, potentially causing severe performance degradation. I have provided a comment with a suggested fix to use a non-blocking asyncio.Semaphore.
verl-project/verl#5646 (comment)