Skip to content

feat(CFW): added AmberELEC support with RG351V and Rg351P devices#234

Open
XargonWan wants to merge 5 commits into
rommapp:mainfrom
XargonWan:main
Open

feat(CFW): added AmberELEC support with RG351V and Rg351P devices#234
XargonWan wants to merge 5 commits into
rommapp:mainfrom
XargonWan:main

Conversation

@XargonWan

@XargonWan XargonWan commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • Added AmberELEC as supported platform (based on ROCKNIX)
  • Fixed apparently wrong commands on doc

Disclaimer: this work is AI assisted but pretty much hand crafted and deeply tested on an Anbernic RG351V and RG351P

@XargonWan XargonWan marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2026 14:19
@XargonWan

XargonWan commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

RG351P support will come in the next PR is in just the controller is mismatched, but everything else is working fine.

Then I don't have any more AmberELEC supported devices to test, feel free to add the missing ones if wished, probably will be just a controller mapping issue.

@pawndev pawndev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside of that little comments, seems great and thanks for updated the documentations !
Will need to non-reg test on others ES-based cfw with the edit on the gamelist part, but that was something great to do !

I don't have any amberelect compatible device to try it on tho 🙈

Comment thread cfw/amberelec/amberelec.go Outdated
@XargonWan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Added support to RG351P

@XargonWan XargonWan changed the title feat(CFW): added AmberELEC support with RG351V device feat(CFW): added AmberELEC support with RG351V and Rg351P devices Jun 1, 2026
@pawndev pawndev mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2026
10 tasks
@pawndev pawndev added this to the v4.9.0.0 milestone Jun 3, 2026
@BrandonKowalski BrandonKowalski modified the milestones: v4.9.0.0, v5.0.0.0? Jun 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants