accounts: clippy and style fixes#11443
Conversation
|
It looks like @vorot93 signed our Contributor License Agreement. 👍 Many thanks, Parity Technologies CLA Bot |
Co-Authored-By: Niklas Adolfsson <niklasadolfsson1@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Niklas Adolfsson <niklasadolfsson1@gmail.com>
| dst.insert(a)?; | ||
| Ok(address) | ||
| }).collect() | ||
| let mut out = Vec::with_capacity(accounts.len()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess that technically the lint triggered this was map().filter() instead map_filter()?
Then you switch to a for loop instead because it was not possible to return the error in filter_map?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I simply didn't want to untangle the mix of Option and Result. And in general the imperative approach seems to me much clearer than the map-and-collect of results. It also returns earlier (on first error) although I'm not sure if it's the desired behavior here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
right, it seems that the actual implementation of KeyDirectory::insert always returns Ok but I don't know, let's ignore it for this PR.
| iv.copy_from_slice(&wallet.encseed[..16]); | ||
|
|
||
| let mut ciphertext = vec![]; | ||
| let mut ciphertext = Vec::new(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not a clippy-lint, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is fine for me, I like Vec::new better but let's keep it open so the others can see this too.
| let mut out = Vec::with_capacity(accounts.len()); | ||
| for account in accounts { | ||
| let address = account.address; | ||
| if existing_accounts.contains(&address) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to have the same behavior as before
| if existing_accounts.contains(&address) { | |
| if !existing_accounts.contains(&address) { |
sorpaas
added
A3-inprogress ⏳
4 participants
This is the initial batch of style fixes as suggested by clippy as well as the general patterns of modern Rust. A couple of notes:
as_refhelper method).