Fix inconsistency issue with policy rule description - #154
Open
emrcbrn wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Same root cause as #45 / #50, applied to the nested policy rule
descriptionattribute onnetbird_policy.When
descriptionis omitted on a rule, the plan records it as null but the API returns"", producing a "Provider produced inconsistent result after apply" error.Mirrors the fix from #50 on
netbird_network: mark the attributeComputedand give it astringdefault.StaticString("")default so plan and applied state agree. The top-levelnetbird_policy.descriptionis alreadyComputed(with aUseStateForUnknownplan modifier) so it's not affected by the same bug; this PR only touches the nested rule attribute.