Add Responsible AI Studio to Assessment & Classification#17
Open
responsibleaiedu-code wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Add Responsible AI Studio to Assessment & Classification#17responsibleaiedu-code wants to merge 1 commit into
responsibleaiedu-code wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds Responsible AI Studio to the Assessment & Classification section.
It generates jurisdiction- and sector-specific AI governance documents — gap analyses, risk registers, bias audits, AI policies, vendor assessments and incident response playbooks — aligned to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. Self-serve with one-time pricing ($29–$59) and a free AI readiness score, so it sits alongside AI Act Companion as a document-generation / gap-assessment tool rather than an enterprise platform.
Disclosure: I'm affiliated with the project. Entry kept factual and in the existing format; happy to adjust wording or move sections if you'd prefer.