Skip to content

doc: Clarify the message key finding logic - #300

Merged
poljar merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
poljar/clarify-advancing
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

doc: Clarify the message key finding logic#300
poljar merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
poljar/clarify-advancing

Conversation

@poljar

@poljar poljar commented Feb 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@poljar
poljar requested a review from dkasak as a code owner February 19, 2026 16:35
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 6 untouched benchmarks


Comparing poljar/clarify-advancing (baade67) with main (0636058)

Open in CodSpeed

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.35%. Comparing base (ee3c987) to head (3132686).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #300      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.33%   91.35%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines        4929     4939      +10     
  Branches     4929     4939      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         4502     4512      +10     
  Misses        273      273              
  Partials      154      154              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment thread src/olm/session/receiver_chain.rs Outdated
@poljar
poljar enabled auto-merge (squash) March 31, 2026 12:50
poljar and others added 2 commits March 31, 2026 15:46
@poljar
poljar force-pushed the poljar/clarify-advancing branch from 8f1c226 to baade67 Compare March 31, 2026 13:46
@poljar
poljar merged commit 34f783a into main Mar 31, 2026
43 checks passed
@poljar
poljar deleted the poljar/clarify-advancing branch March 31, 2026 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants