Feature/codegen trailing eof - #35
Closed
alambert-lanl wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
alambert-lanl
force-pushed
the
feature/codegen-trailing-eof
branch
from
July 10, 2026 01:29
55a9967 to
edde4f1
Compare
alambert-lanl
force-pushed
the
feature/codegen-trailing-eof
branch
from
July 10, 2026 19:12
edde4f1 to
8878614
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allows for structures like
Custom checks are added such that
bool eof;is the only thing allowed to trail behind self-recursive optionals. Furthermore, I rewrote the LinkedList width caching logic. Excited to see how much of a performance regression this optimization will bring.