Skip to content

sortslice: match stdlib sort calls by type identity, not identifier text #38053

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
pelikhan merged 5 commits into from
Jun 9, 2026
Merged

sortslice: match stdlib sort calls by type identity, not identifier text #38053

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
cbcd509
Initial plan
Copilot Jun 9, 2026
2c43a51
Fix sortslice to match stdlib sort by package identity
Copilot Jun 9, 2026
135db56
Guard sortslice package-object lookup against nil types info
Copilot Jun 9, 2026
669902f
Document nil types-info guard in sortslice analyzer
Copilot Jun 9, 2026
43099fe
Add TypesInfo nil guard in sortslice analyzer
Copilot Jun 9, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 11 additions & 1 deletion pkg/linters/sortslice/sortslice.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ package sortslice
import (
"fmt"
"go/ast"
"go/types"

"golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis"
"golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis/passes/inspect"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -52,7 +53,16 @@ func run(pass *analysis.Pass) (any, error) {
return
}
pkgIdent, ok := sel.X.(*ast.Ident)
if !ok || pkgIdent.Name != "sort" {
if !ok {
return
}
obj := pass.TypesInfo.ObjectOf(pkgIdent)

@github-actions github-actions Bot Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing nil guard on pass.TypesInfo itself: the code calls pass.TypesInfo.ObjectOf(...) without first checking pass.TypesInfo != nil, so a non-standard or embedded driver that omits type info would panic here rather than skip gracefully.

💡 Suggested fix

Add an early guard before the ObjectOf call:

if pass.TypesInfo == nil {
    return
}
obj := pass.TypesInfo.ObjectOf(pkgIdent)

The existing if obj == nil check (line 61) only protects against ObjectOf returning nil on an initialised TypesInfo — it does not prevent a nil-pointer dereference on pass.TypesInfo itself. Standard drivers (go vet, golangci-lint, analysistest) always populate TypesInfo, so this will not trigger in normal CI; but it is a latent panic for any embedded or custom driver that skips type-checking. Adding the guard is a one-liner and is consistent with the defensive style already present in this function.

// ObjectOf can be nil when type information is incomplete.
if obj == nil {
return
}
pkgName, ok := obj.(*types.PkgName)
if !ok || pkgName.Imported().Path() != "sort" {

@github-actions github-actions Bot Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[/tdd] The ReportRangef calls a few lines below use hardcoded "sort.Slice" / "sort.SliceStable" strings, so aliased-import users see sort.Slice is not type-safe for code that says s.Slice(...). The alias_import.go testdata validates this as intentional. If so, a short comment in the switch block explaining the design choice would protect future contributors from accidentally "fixing" it to the local alias name.

💡 Alternative: dynamic message using the local alias

If you prefer the message to match the user's actual code:

case "Slice":
    pass.ReportRangef(call, "%s.Slice is not type-safe; use slices.SortFunc instead", pkgIdent.Name)
case "SliceStable":
    pass.ReportRangef(call, "%s.SliceStable is not type-safe; use slices.SortStableFunc instead", pkgIdent.Name)

With import s "sort" the diagnostic would then read s.Slice is not type-safe, which maps directly to the code the user wrote. The alias_import.go // want annotations would need updating accordingly.

return
}

Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions pkg/linters/sortslice/testdata/src/sortslice/alias_import.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
package sortslice

import s "sort"

func BadSliceAliasedImport(items []string) {
s.Slice(items, func(i, j int) bool { return items[i] < items[j] }) // want `sort\.Slice is not type-safe`

@github-actions github-actions Bot Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[/diagnose] The // want annotation documents that the expected diagnostic text is sort\.Slice even though the call is s.Slice. This is a useful precision signal: when type-info resolution was added, the message string was intentionally left as the canonical package name rather than the local alias. A short comment here (or at the switch in sortslice.go) would make this boundary explicit and prevent a future refactor from "fixing" the message to s.Slice and breaking this expectation.

}

func BadSliceStableAliasedImport(items []string) {
s.SliceStable(items, func(i, j int) bool { return items[i] < items[j] }) // want `sort\.SliceStable is not type-safe`
}
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions pkg/linters/sortslice/testdata/src/sortslice/shadowed_identifier.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
package sortslice

type customSort struct{}

func (customSort) Slice(_ []string, _ func(i, j int) bool) {}
func (customSort) SliceStable(_ []string, _ func(i, j int) bool) {}

func GoodShadowedSortIdentifier(items []string) {
sort := customSort{}
sort.Slice(items, func(i, j int) bool { return items[i] < items[j] })
sort.SliceStable(items, func(i, j int) bool { return items[i] < items[j] })
}
Loading