Reduced Data Temporary Softfork, implemented as a modified BIP9 temporary deployment by dathonohm · Pull Request #238 · bitcoinknots/bitcoin

dathonohm · 2025-11-24T22:13:14Z

ReducedData Temporary Softfork (BIP-110/RDTS)

Implementation of BIP-110 for Bitcoin Knots.

Versionbits extensions

max_activation_height (mutually exclusive with timeout) with BIP8/148-style mandatory signaling enforcement
active_duration for temporary deployments (expiry after ~1 year) and a corresponding EXPIRED BIP9 state
Per-deployment activation threshold (55% for RDTS instead of global 95%)

Consensus rules (when DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA is active)

Output scripts limited to 34 bytes (OP_RETURN limited to 83 bytes)
Data push size limit reduced to 256 bytes (SCRIPT_VERIFY_REDUCED_DATA), except BIP16 redeemScript
DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_WITNESS_PROGRAM, DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_TAPROOT_VERSION, DISCOURAGE_OP_SUCCESS enforced at consensus level
Taproot annex forbidden
Taproot control block limited to 257 bytes (tree depth 7)
OP_IF/OP_NOTIF forbidden in Tapscript
Empty witness required for P2A spends
UTXO-height exemption: inputs spending UTXOs created before activation are exempt from script rules

Other features

The above rules are enforced unconditionally in policy
NODE_REDUCED_DATA service bit (bit 27) with preferential peering
DNS seed filtering for BIP-110 nodes (x8000009)
Up to 2 non-BIP110 outbound peers allowed

Commit structure (34 commits)

The commits have been structured such that every commit passes all tests (except for the coin_age_priority UBSan issue which is fixed outside this PR). The BIP9 modifications are placed first, since the actual consensus validation changes depend on the existence of DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA (originally a buried deployment).

Two commits are intentionally large because their changes break a large amount of tests, so test adaptations that must land atomically are bundled: 45c004e30e and 983555f940.

GregTonoski · 2025-11-25T12:46:41Z

Let me suggest adding a note that OP_RETURN is deprecated in help texts, please.

cal-gooo · 2025-11-30T14:33:49Z

what's the timeline to get this merged so the signaling can use this implementation?

dathonohm · 2025-12-01T15:34:54Z

There is no specific timeline to get this merged into Knots, as it is not confirmed that it will be eligible for merging, even when complete. However, I am aiming to have this draft ready for review in the next few days.

Miner signaling can still use this deployment if the activation client is released after the start of the signaling period (which is today, so this will definitely happen).

dathonohm · 2025-12-02T21:52:52Z

All comments from #234 are now addressed.

Undrafting since the code is relatively stable now.

Still needs rebase.

dathonohm · 2025-12-02T22:05:06Z

@GregTonoski

Let me suggest adding a note that OP_RETURN is deprecated in help texts, please.

OP_RETURN is not deprecated; it is merely limited to 83 bytes in consensus.

dathonohm · 2025-12-03T05:39:45Z

Rebased on v29.2.knots20251110.

Ready for review.

stackingsaunter · 2025-12-03T20:03:23Z

Concept NACK

There shouldn't be any emergency softfork to address spam without at least a sketeched out permanent solution

dathonohm · 2025-12-03T20:44:32Z

@stackingsaunter Please keep conceptual discussion to the BIP PR. This PR is for code review only.

luke-jr

Review not complete yet

dathonohm · 2026-01-03T03:01:27Z

All review comments are now addressed.

CI is now fully passing (except for the "test each commit" job).

A tag has been created for the current version, RC2 (identical to this branch except for the last commit, which updates the UA string for BIP-110).

Next I will make a release for RC2, and clean up the commit history here.

dathonohm · 2026-01-13T01:48:18Z

I have begun work on RC3.

RC2's branch is archived here (the prior state of this PR, commit 5a54af7, is the penultimate commit on that branch).

RC3 will include some minor improvements to peer discovery and the guix build, as well as better testing against non-110 peers.

luke-jr · 2026-02-05T19:57:39Z

Let me suggest adding a note that OP_RETURN is deprecated in help texts, please.

OP_RETURN is not deprecated; it is merely limited to 83 bytes in consensus.

datacarriersize is not deprecated, but OP_RETURN is. Documenting it is out of scope for this PR, though.

luke-jr

Would prefer to squash/eliminate things like the UA changes and BIP444 references (added and replaced).

note to self: this review was up to f4045f3

luke-jr · 2026-02-06T20:56:57Z

    // at which all the in-chain inputs of the tx were included in blocks.
    // Typical usage of GetPriority with chainActive.Height() will ensure this.
-    int heightDiff = currentHeight - cachedHeight;
+    int heightDiff = int(currentHeight) - int(cachedHeight);


Why is this needed?

Fixes UBSan unsigned integer overflow: 432 - 433 can't be represented in unsigned int (https://github.com/dathonohm/bitcoin/actions/runs/19997804442, ASan+UBSan job). The cast makes the subtraction signed so the dResult < 0 check on line 114 works correctly. Same pattern as line 70 in the same file (introduced in 28b7673).

As the comment says, calling this with a currentHeight < cachedHeight is invalid...

Removing this commit to expose the failure, then I'll work on a fix. This is an upstream bug.

…height from reduced_data script validation rules Bugfix: validation: Do not cache the result of CheckInputScripts if flags_per_input is used (and avoid using it when unnecessary) Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Co-Authored-By: Lőrinc <pap.lorinc@gmail.com> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 71722a2

Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leohaf@orangepill.ovh> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: a6ac602

Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leohaf@orangepill.ovh> Co-Authored-By: Lőrinc <pap.lorinc@gmail.com> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 3428f6c

Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leohaf@orangepill.ovh> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 14dd104

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 1b1ef4f

…BLE_WITNESS_PROGRAM,UPGRADABLE_TAPROOT_VERSION,OP_SUCCESS} Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 90760ff

…x8000009; adapt tests Squash of: - b662a23198 Define a service bit for BIP148 - 0db5282edd Add questionmark to end of BIP148 service bit string, and add to bitcoin-cli - b5a77cda16 Preferentially peer with nodes enforcing RDTS; rename BIP148 references to ReducedData; adapt tests - 85289a3ac3 net: ask DNS seed for x8000009 (original: ea8c1ee) Define a service bit for BIP148 Github-Pull: bitcoin#10532 Rebased-From: cd74a23fcf9588199e196ab31bc64972400c2027 Add questionmark to end of BIP148 service bit string, and add to bitcoin-cli Preferentially peer with nodes enforcing RDTS; rename BIP148 references to ReducedData; adapt tests Combines: preferential peering (367b344), BIP148->ReducedData rename (85a78b8), service bit test fixes (f98fe90, ebe821e, 5efab4a, 4b757d8, f648a21). net: ask DNS seed for x8000009 Co-Authored-By: Luke Dashjr <luke-jr+git@utopios.org> Co-Authored-By: 3c853b6299 <3c853b6299@pm.me> Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leohaf@orangepill.ovh> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 983555f

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: f62f5fd

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 7de9918

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: a6fc78a

…ctive_duration Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 8cd9085

…_duration Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: b492df6

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 88c569d

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: becf3de

…ployments Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 6a57462

…eight and set vbrequired during mandatory signaling Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 1bf0c35

…Taproot logic; adapt tests Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: f664525

Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 41abcea

…to reduce data push size limit to 256 bytes (except for P2SH redeemScript push); adapt tests Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leo@haf.ovh> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: f595e6a

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 9efe141

…ill unused) Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leo@haf.ovh> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: e1ae973

…DUCED_DATA (still unused) Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 4743b66

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 1984769

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: f58d34b

…o cap output scripts at 83 bytes Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 34621ba

…l never), limit non-OP_RETURN scripts to 34 bytes and OP_RETURN outputs to 83 bytes MAX_OUTPUT_DATA_SIZE constant definition moved here from its original commit (4a8d8d0) due to commit reordering. Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 091c18c

chrisguida

Post-merge review:

This is a fairly large change, but for a consensus change it's actually pretty small.

Consensus rule changes themselves are very simple and solid, and match the bip110 spec exactly. The most complicated part seems to be the UTXO grandfathering, glad reviewers caught a bug there in a previous cycle, and the fix + regression tests also look solid. (Note, grandfathering seems to only be active in consensus not policy?)

Tests also look very thorough, except for a few minor things I noted inline.

Been running this code in production for months now, so I'm happy to recommend it, let's activate this thing!

crACK/tACK f62f5fd

(note: the actual branch merged into the 0508 release of Knots is rdts_combined-29+knots (see spec). I have verified that that branch reproduces all of the commits on this branch exactly, except for the peering code which expands the limit on the number of non-bip110 outbound peers from 2 to 8.)

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:17:11Z

+        tx_valid = self.create_test_transaction(script_opreturn_82, value=0)
+        result = node.testmempoolaccept([tx_valid.serialize().hex()])[0]
+        # OP_RETURN with value=0 may be rejected by standardness policy
+        self.log.info(f"  ✓ OP_RETURN with {len(script_opreturn_82)} bytes: {result.get('allowed', False)}")


Should be an assert rather than just a log?

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:20:29Z

+        if result is None:
+            self.log.info("  ✓ Generation tx with 83-byte OP_RETURN output accepted")
+        else:
+            self.log.info(f"  Note: Generation tx OP_RETURN result: {result}")


assert this result?

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:21:51Z

+        result = node.testmempoolaccept([spending_tx.serialize().hex()])[0]
+        assert_equal(result['allowed'], False)
+        # Rejection happens during script verification
+        assert any(x in result['reject-reason'] for x in ['mempool-script-verify-flag', 'witness-program', 'bad-witness', 'discouraged'])


"discouraged" happens regardless of rdts rules

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:23:09Z

+        if result2['allowed']:
+            self.log.info(f"  DEBUG: Taproot spend with annex was unexpectedly accepted: {result2}")
+        assert_equal(result2['allowed'], False)
+        self.log.info(f"  ✓ Taproot spend with annex: REJECTED ({result2['reject-reason']})")


assert reject reason (same for rules 4-7)

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:26:54Z

+        # All undefined versions (v2-v16) are validated identically
+        self.log.info("  ✓ Witness versions v2-v16 are all similarly rejected")
+
+    def test_taproot_annex_rejection(self):


rules 4-7 only test policy enforcement, maybe add a submitblock test for consensus testing?

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:29:58Z

+        assert 'non-mandatory-script-verify-flag' in result['reject-reason'] or 'Push value size limit exceeded' in result['reject-reason']
+        self.log.info("  ✓ PUSHDATA with 257 bytes rejected in witness script")
+
+        # Test 2.3: P2SH redeemScript with 300-byte PUSHDATA (tests BIP16 exception boundary)


Should add a test case that tests >256B redeemScripts that don't have too-large pushes

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:31:28Z

+        assert 'mempool-script-verify-flag' in result_normal['reject-reason']
+        self.log.info(f"    ✓ Normal testmempoolaccept correctly rejected: {result_normal['reject-reason']}")
+
+        # Test 2: Try to bypass with ignore_rejects=["non-mandatory-script-verify-flag"]


Suggested change

# Test 2: Try to bypass with ignore_rejects=["non-mandatory-script-verify-flag"]

# Test 2: Try to bypass with ignore_rejects=["mempool-script-verify-flag-failed"]

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:54:31Z

+    const auto reduced_data_start_height = DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA)
+        ? m_chainman.m_versionbitscache.StateSinceHeight(pindex->pprev, params.GetConsensus(), Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA)
+        : std::numeric_limits<int>::max();
+
+    const CheckTxInputsRules chk_input_rules{DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA) ? CheckTxInputsRules::OutputSizeLimit : CheckTxInputsRules::None};


Could avoid creating flags_per_input when rdts is inactive (see also line 2956):

Suggested change

const auto reduced_data_start_height = DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA)

? m_chainman.m_versionbitscache.StateSinceHeight(pindex->pprev, params.GetConsensus(), Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA)

: std::numeric_limits<int>::max();

const CheckTxInputsRules chk_input_rules{DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA) ? CheckTxInputsRules::OutputSizeLimit : CheckTxInputsRules::None};

const bool reduced_data_active = DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA);

const int reduced_data_start_height = reduced_data_active

? m_chainman.m_versionbitscache.StateSinceHeight(pindex->pprev, params.GetConsensus(), Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA)

: std::numeric_limits<int>::max();

const CheckTxInputsRules chk_input_rules{reduced_data_active ? CheckTxInputsRules::OutputSizeLimit : CheckTxInputsRules::None};

chrisguida · 2026-06-23T04:56:22Z

+            flags_per_input.clear();
            for (size_t j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++) {
                prevheights[j] = view.AccessCoin(tx.vin[j].prevout).nHeight;
+                if (prevheights[j] < reduced_data_start_height) {


..continued from 2906:

Suggested change

if (prevheights[j] < reduced_data_start_height) {

if (reduced_data_active && prevheights[j] < reduced_data_start_height) {

dathonohm mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2025

ReducedData Temporary Softfork #234

Closed

kwsantiago reviewed Nov 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/validation.cpp

Comment thread src/validation.cpp Outdated

Comment thread src/script/interpreter.cpp

dathonohm mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2025

BIP 110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork bitcoin/bips#2017

Merged

dathonohm marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 23:29

dathonohm force-pushed the uasf-modified-bip9 branch from df70e59 to d699af3 Compare December 3, 2025 05:38

kwsantiago reviewed Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

luke-jr requested changes Dec 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

dathonohm requested a review from luke-jr December 27, 2025 02:59

dathonohm force-pushed the uasf-modified-bip9 branch from 994b2fe to 5a54af7 Compare January 1, 2026 01:33

luke-jr added the high priority label Jan 8, 2026

kwsantiago reviewed Jan 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/validation.cpp

Comment thread src/script/interpreter.cpp

Comment thread src/validation.cpp Outdated

Comment thread src/protocol.h Outdated

Comment thread src/txmempool.cpp

Comment thread test/functional/rpc_net.py

Comment thread src/validation.cpp Outdated

dathonohm force-pushed the uasf-modified-bip9 branch from 5a54af7 to cc089c4 Compare January 13, 2026 01:28

stackitdeep reviewed Jan 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp Outdated

stackitdeep reviewed Jan 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/script/descriptor.cpp

stackitdeep reviewed Jan 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/rpc/blockchain.cpp

stackitdeep reviewed Jan 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/script/interpreter.cpp

luke-jr reviewed Feb 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

luke-jr mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2026

Prompt user after upgrading to RDTS-enabled version #256

Closed

dathonohm force-pushed the uasf-modified-bip9 branch from f4045f3 to 1d3cdac Compare February 12, 2026 22:02

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026

test: implement functional tests for ReducedData Spec

8084b23

Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leohaf@orangepill.ovh> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: a6ac602

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026

test: Add UTXO height-based REDUCED_DATA enforcement test

e77c5f6

Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leohaf@orangepill.ovh> Co-Authored-By: Lőrinc <pap.lorinc@gmail.com> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 3428f6c

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026

test: add functional tests for modified BIP9 temporary deployment

5eedc73

Co-Authored-By: Léo Haf <leohaf@orangepill.ovh> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 14dd104

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026

doc: add BIP-110 to bips.md

35ec869

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 1b1ef4f

luke-jr added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026

Policy: Do not allow user to bypass SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_{UPGRADA…

736d10d

…BLE_WITNESS_PROGRAM,UPGRADABLE_TAPROOT_VERSION,OP_SUCCESS} Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 90760ff

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026

net: allow up to 2 non-BIP110 outbound peers

71965a5

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: f62f5fd

luke-jr approved these changes May 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

versionbits: add expiry support to versionbit deployments

0c87d1a

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 7de9918

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

versionbits: add max_activation_height for mandatory BIP9 activation

ddf3949

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: a6fc78a

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

chainparams: support regtest vbparams for max_activation_height and a…

70c8b16

…ctive_duration Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 8cd9085

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

test: add versionbits unit tests for max_activation_height and active…

3253348

…_duration Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: b492df6

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

versionbits: add per-deployment activation threshold

4390cc0

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 88c569d

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

chainparams: support regtest vbparams for per-deployment threshold

6d3d0c0

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: becf3de

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

versionbits: add EXPIRED state to BIP9 state machine for temporary de…

32c92ef

…ployments Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 6a57462

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

versionbits: add mandatory signaling enforcement for max_activation_h…

40175c2

…eight and set vbrequired during mandatory signaling Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 1bf0c35

luke-jr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

script: use TAPROOT_CONTROL_MAX_NODE_COUNT_REDUCED for non-consensus …

ecb20fe

…Taproot logic; adapt tests Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: f664525

luke-jr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

policy: enforce SCRIPT_VERIFY_REDUCED_DATA as a policy rule

77e290f

Co-Authored-By: Dathon Ohm <dathonohm@proton.me> Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 41abcea

luke-jr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

script: forbid Taproot annex with SCRIPT_VERIFY_REDUCED_DATA

549a83a

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 9efe141

luke-jr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

script: Limit Taproot control block to 257 bytes for SCRIPT_VERIFY_RE…

e27286b

…DUCED_DATA (still unused) Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 4743b66

luke-jr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

script: require empty witness for P2A spends

38996fb

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 1984769

luke-jr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

consensus: Add no-op flags to CheckTxInputs function

993ca94

Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: f58d34b

luke-jr added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026

consensus: Define CheckTxInputsRules::OutputSizeLimit flag (unused) t…

ff9a334

…o cap output scripts at 83 bytes Github-Pull: #238 Rebased-From: 34621ba

chrisguida reviewed Jun 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

dathonohm mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2026

BIP-110: advance to Complete status bitcoin/bips#2201

Merged

kwsantiago mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2026

validation: keep script cache enabled when RDTS deployment inactive #323

Open

	# Test 2: Try to bypass with ignore_rejects=["non-mandatory-script-verify-flag"]
	# Test 2: Try to bypass with ignore_rejects=["mempool-script-verify-flag-failed"]

	if (prevheights[j] < reduced_data_start_height) {
	if (reduced_data_active && prevheights[j] < reduced_data_start_height) {

Uh oh!

Conversation

dathonohm commented Nov 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

ReducedData Temporary Softfork (BIP-110/RDTS)

Consensus rules (when DEPLOYMENT_REDUCED_DATA is active)

Other features

Commit structure (34 commits)

Uh oh!

GregTonoski commented Nov 25, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cal-gooo commented Nov 30, 2025

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Dec 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Dec 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Dec 2, 2025

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Dec 3, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

stackingsaunter commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

luke-jr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Jan 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

luke-jr commented Feb 5, 2026

Uh oh!

luke-jr left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dathonohm commented Nov 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dathonohm commented Dec 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dathonohm commented Dec 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dathonohm commented Dec 3, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dathonohm commented Jan 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

luke-jr left a comment •

edited

Loading

dathonohm Mar 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading