Skip to content

Microsoft Kiota: Code Generation Literal Injection in Kiota Python Generator

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 30, 2026 in microsoft/kiota • Updated Jul 24, 2026

Package

nuget Microsoft.OpenAPI.Kiota (NuGet)

Affected versions

< 1.32.0

Patched versions

1.32.0
nuget Microsoft.OpenAPI.Kiota.Builder (NuGet)
< 1.32.0
1.32.0

Description

Code Generation Literal Injection in Kiota Python Generator Leads to Arbitrary Code Execution at Import Time.

The Kiota Python code generator is vulnerable to a code generation literal injection issue when processing malicious or untrusted OpenAPI specifications. Specifically, attacker-controlled enum value descriptions from x-ms-enum.values[].description can flow into generated Python files without newline sanitization, allowing injected content to escape a comment context and execute at module scope when the generated module is imported.

This issue requires user interaction in the form of generating a client from a malicious specification and importing the generated code, which is a common development and CI workflow.

Impact

A malicious OpenAPI specification can cause arbitrary Python code to be emitted into generated model files. The payload executes when the affected module is imported.

Potential impact includes

Credential theft from developer or CI environments
Exfiltration of environment variables and secrets
Source code disclosure
Persistence via regenerated backdoored client output
Who is impacted
Developers generating Python SDKs from external or untrusted OpenAPI specs
Teams with CI/CD automation that regenerates clients from remote specification URLs
Any environment importing generated Python modules before manual review
Vulnerability details
Two gaps combine to enable exploitation:

Enum description cleanup gap

In KiotaBuilder.SetEnumOptions, enum option descriptions are assigned to Documentation.DescriptionTemplate without CleanupDescription on this path, allowing control characters such as newlines to propagate.

Python description sanitization gap

PythonConventionService.RemoveInvalidDescriptionCharacters escapes backslashes and triple quotes but did not remove carriage return/newline characters, unlike some other language convention services.

Exploit path

Malicious newline in x-ms-enum description is emitted through enum writing path.
Generated inline comment output is split by newline.
Subsequent attacker-controlled line lands at module scope in generated .py file.
Importing the module executes the injected code.

Attack vectors

OpenAPI specifications hosted at attacker-controlled URLs
Supply-chain scenarios where third-party specs are consumed automatically
CI pipelines that generate and then import or test generated Python clients

Patches

microsoft/kiota#7735

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately:

Only generate from trusted, internally controlled OpenAPI specification sources.
Disable or gate automatic generation from remote specs in CI/CD.
Add validation/sanitization for x-ms-enum descriptions before generation.
Review generated Python files for suspicious top-level statements near enum/model declarations.
Run generation and validation in isolated environments without access to production secrets.

Remediation

Upgrade to Kiota 1.32.0 or later.

Regenerate existing Python clients to replace previously generated vulnerable output.

Recommended validation after upgrade

Regenerate from the same spec used in proof-of-concept testing
Confirm malicious multi-line enum descriptions no longer produce executable top-level output

References

@baywet baywet published to microsoft/kiota Jun 30, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 16, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 24, 2026
Reviewed Jul 24, 2026
Last updated Jul 24, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(60th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-59862

GHSA ID

GHSA-7f3j-j7jj-r3vr

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.