Skip to content

Netty: Security Control Bypass via CORS Short-Circuit Failure

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 20, 2026 in netty/netty • Updated Jul 22, 2026

Package

maven io.netty:netty-codec-http (Maven)

Affected versions

>= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final
< 4.1.136.Final

Patched versions

4.2.16.Final
4.1.136.Final

Description

Summary

Netty's CorsHandler provides a shortCircuit() configuration designed to reject unauthorized cross-origin requests immediately, acting as a security control before requests reach the application. However, due to a logical operator error in the origin evaluation process, this protection can be entirely bypassed. An attacker can bypass the short-circuit mechanism by sending a request with an Origin: null header. This failure forwards unauthorized requests to the backend application, bypassing intended access controls.

Details

In io.netty.handler.codec.http.cors.CorsHandler#channelRead, the short-circuit logic relies on the configuration returned by getForOrigin(origin) to determine if an origin is authorized. If getForOrigin returns a configuration object, the short-circuit check (!(origin == null || config != null)) is bypassed, and the request proceeds to the backend.

The vulnerability is located in the getForOrigin method:

            if (corsConfig.isNullOriginAllowed() || NULL_ORIGIN.equals(requestOrigin)) {
                return corsConfig;
            }

If an attacker sends Origin: null, NULL_ORIGIN.equals(requestOrigin) evaluates to true. The method returns the configuration object regardless of whether isNullOriginAllowed() was configured by the developer. The short-circuit is bypassed.

Impact

Applications relying on CorsHandler's short-circuit feature to prevent unauthorized cross-origin requests from reaching their backend logic are completely exposed. The framework fails to enforce the developer's intended access controls, allowing unauthorized requests to be processed.

References

@chrisvest chrisvest published to netty/netty Jul 20, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 21, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 22, 2026
Reviewed Jul 22, 2026
Last updated Jul 22, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(31st percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-56746

GHSA ID

GHSA-6cqp-g7gg-8hr5

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.