Adding CODEOWNERS File#203
Open
49Indium wants to merge 8 commits into
Open
Conversation
Member
|
I'm assuming the current errors are because people were kicked after 2FA? |
jenseni-git
requested changes
Mar 24, 2025
jenseni-git
left a comment
jenseni-git
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider changing offending tags from @xxxx to @ XXXX. Otherwise, I think it's valuable documentation.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To help contributors find people knowledgeable with each part of the bot and to try to simplify the getting reviews, I've added a CODEOWNERS file. I used a combination of
git shortlog -n,git blameand my own knowledge to assign code owners.I've checked with everyone on this file, but feel free to add your name in spots if you think it's missing. There are a few files without codeowners, but I think that this is ok. These are usually because the main contributor didn't want to be the codeowner, or because the file is very old.
I'll also add documentation for this as well, but that is for the github pages, so will be a different PR.