Skip to content

patina_internal_depex: Report protocol present status #1552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
yangrongwei wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+43 −1
Open

patina_internal_depex: Report protocol present status #1552

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d4a0688
patina_internal_depex: Report eval steps on demand
Jun 3, 2026
bea1472
simplify reporting logic & format
yangrongwei Jun 6, 2026
aa8fa25
adjust format and let clippy be happy
yangrongwei Jun 7, 2026
f02fd80
Change target name to "patina_depex_report'
yangrongwei Jun 8, 2026
bcc2168
remove target "patina_depex_report"
yangrongwei Jun 10, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions core/patina_internal_depex/src/lib.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -282,6 +282,27 @@ impl Depex {
false
}

/// Report protocol present status in the DEPEX expression.
pub fn report_protocol_present(&self) {
for opcode in self.expression.iter() {
match opcode {
Opcode::Push(guid, present) => {
log::warn!(
target: "patina_dxe_core",
" {guid:?} : {present}"
);
Comment on lines +290 to +293

@makubacki makubacki Jun 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having this at warn level coupled with the patina_dxe_core target is a code smell in terms of coupling. Basically, this assumes code exists a certain way in the code (patina_dxe_core) that uses this crate (patina_internal_depex) as a dependency.

This type of print should be at least info or a more verbose type if left at the patina_dxe_core target level.

But I really think this code should really just return something like an iterator of protocols present for a given Depex so all logging stays in the caller.

@os-d os-d Jun 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. I just meant don't use a target at all for the logging. It will inherit the patina_internal_depex target if a consumer wants to filter it.

But, to Michael's point, I think that returning an iterator here and letting the caller print it works well.

}
Opcode::End => {
log::warn!(
target: "patina_dxe_core",
" {opcode:?}"
);
}
_ => {}
}
}
}

/// If the depex expression is an associated dependency, it returns the associated dependency.
pub fn is_associated(&self) -> Option<AssociatedDependency> {
match self.expression.first() {
Expand Down
23 changes: 22 additions & 1 deletion patina_dxe_core/src/pi_dispatcher.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -105,13 +105,34 @@ impl<P: PlatformInfo> PiDispatcher<P> {

/// Displays drivers that were discovered but not dispatched.
pub fn display_discovered_not_dispatched(&self) {
for driver in &self.dispatcher_context.lock().pending_drivers {
// Summary report
for driver in self.dispatcher_context.lock().pending_drivers.iter() {
log::warn!(
"Driver {} ({:?}) found but not dispatched.",
driver.name.as_deref().unwrap_or("Unnamed"),
guid_fmt!(driver.file_name)
);
}

// Detail report
log::warn!("Begin Detail Report:");

@makubacki makubacki Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Begin Detail Report" is too ambiguous. Please change to something like "Begin Report of Drivers Not Dispatched".

for driver in self.dispatcher_context.lock().pending_drivers.iter() {
log::warn!(
"Driver {} ({:?}) found but not dispatched. Protocols present:",
driver.name.as_deref().unwrap_or("Unnamed"),
guid_fmt!(driver.file_name)
);

match &driver.depex {
Some(depex) => {
depex.report_protocol_present();
}
_ => {
log::warn!(" No Depex");
}
}
}
log::warn!("End Detail Report.");
}
Comment on lines +117 to 136

@makubacki makubacki Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The messages in this "detailed report" should be at info level or higher. I think debug level.

The normal case of a driver not dispatched is already covered by warn above. This is debug information.


/// Initializes the dispatcher by registering for FV protocol installation events.
Expand Down
Loading