Skip to content

Please include errata on control IDs that were changed from 5.1.1 #302

Description

@olivejoysantillan-oss

User Story:

As an OSCAL user, the changes in control IDs need to be documented too, on top of the new controls and modifications. For example, in 5.2 AC-20a.01 was previously AC-20a.1 in 5.1.1 these changes are crucial with our tool

Goals:

Documenting changes in control IDs provides a more accurate picture of the differences between 5.1.1 and 5.2

Dependencies:

{Describe any previous issues or related work that must be completed to start or complete this issue.}

Acceptance Criteria

  • All readme documentation affected by the changes in this issue have been updated.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals of this User Story. This issue is referenced in the PR.
  • The CI-CD build process runs without any reported errors on the PR. This can be confirmed by reviewing that all checks have passed in the PR.

{The items above are general acceptance criteria for all User Stories. Please describe anything else that must be completed for this issue to be considered resolved.}

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    User StoryThe issue is a user story for a development task.enhancementThe issue adds a new feature, capability, or artifact to the repository.

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    Status
    Needs Triage

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions