Skip to content

VisualOptions() constructor shouldn't require a testName #288

Description

@nadvolod

It doesn't seem to make sense to require a testName for new VisualOptions("") because a testName isn't relevant until you do takeSnapshot(String testName)

Screen Shot 2022-04-01 at 12 58 20 PM

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestjavaJava Bindings

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions