Replies: 1 comment
|
Yes, keeping it the same as the bitslice syntax was the idea. I'm not against changing it again if the alternative would be more intuitive. Writing a tool to convert automatically wouldn't be too hard. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sail currently uses
mstatus[MIE]syntax for bitfields (formerlymstatus->MIE()IIRC). But in my experience most people writing pseudocode usemstatus.MIE, and it is also more consistent with most programming languages (e.g. C).Probably shouldn't change the syntax it a second time! I was just wondering what the motivation was. I guess it's consistent with
mstatus[4]or whatever?All reactions