Update Discourse data data [skip ci]

Author: precice-bot

assets/data/faq.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
-  "generated_at": "2026-06-17T10:48:44.311070",
+  "generated_at": "2026-06-18T10:15:47.834641",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 44,
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-volume-coupling/27",
       "created_at": "2019-09-23T20:55:55.190Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2025-08-11T13:12:45.035Z",
-      "views": 3300,
+      "views": 3303,
       "posts_count": 9,
       "like_count": 2,
       "excerpt": "I read that you do surface coupling?\nDo you support volume coupling too?"
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/restarting-coupled-fsi-simulation-with-precice/117",
       "created_at": "2019-12-06T09:10:16.329Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2024-07-03T15:56:51.883Z",
-      "views": 2416,
+      "views": 2418,
       "posts_count": 11,
       "like_count": 5,
       "excerpt": "Dear all,\nI am trying to validate my fluid and structure mesh for the FSI1 case of cylinder-flap test. As the refinement of the fluid and structure mesh increases, it is difficult for implicit FSI coupling to converge. Therefore, my idea is to use a \u2026"
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-with-moving-meshes/53",
       "created_at": "2019-10-14T12:30:50.463Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2024-06-06T02:01:13.798Z",
-      "views": 1626,
+      "views": 1628,
       "posts_count": 29,
       "like_count": 7,
       "excerpt": "What happens when the interface is moving?"
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-with-gpus-or-other-accelerator-cards/822",
       "created_at": "2021-12-08T11:09:10.769Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2023-05-10T15:52:06.292Z",
-      "views": 949,
+      "views": 952,
       "posts_count": 5,
       "like_count": 4,
       "excerpt": "My target system features GPUs or other accelerator cards.\nCan preCICE use them to accelerate the simulation?"
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/where-can-i-find-published-literature-related-to-precice/30",
       "created_at": "2019-09-23T21:01:54.553Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-08T12:14:44.073Z",
-      "views": 684,
+      "views": 685,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
       "excerpt": "I am interested in what has been published related to preCICE.\nWhere can I find more information on the academic side of the project?"
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/3d-1d-coupling/388",
       "created_at": "2020-11-13T07:39:48.596Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2020-11-13T08:51:54.069Z",
-      "views": 1707,
+      "views": 1708,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 1,
       "excerpt": "Hi!\nis there a way to couple a 1D simulation (OpenModelica) with a 3D simulation (OpenFoam)?\nthx"
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-one-way-coupling/28",
       "created_at": "2019-09-23T20:58:29.741Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2020-04-27T10:58:40.567Z",
-      "views": 2694,
+      "views": 2695,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 0,
       "excerpt": "Can I couple two participants one-way?"
@@ -225,10 +225,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-interpolate-between-unstructured-and-structured-meshes/56",
       "created_at": "2019-10-14T12:37:35.342Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-14T12:37:54.840Z",
-      "views": 519,
+      "views": 521,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Or: Can preCICE interpolate between an arbitrary / unstructured mesh and a regular / structured mesh?"
     },
     {
       "id": 55,
@@ -237,10 +237,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/does-partitioned-coupling-introduce-error/55",
       "created_at": "2019-10-14T12:36:10.314Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-14T12:36:26.189Z",
-      "views": 489,
+      "views": 490,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
     },
     {
       "id": 54,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
       "views": 523,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Can the individual solvers run on two different platforms on two different machines in/out of a network?"
     },
     {
       "id": 52,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
       "views": 522,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Which code is executing the coupling iterations given that preCICE does not really have a centralized engine to orchestrate the simulation?"
     },
     {
       "id": 26,
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
       "views": 603,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "How do you test preCICE and its official adapters?\nCan I trust you?"
     },
     {
       "id": 50,
@@ -285,10 +285,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/which-openfoam-versions-are-supported/50",
       "created_at": "2019-10-13T19:13:05.736Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-13T19:19:48.194Z",
-      "views": 861,
+      "views": 862,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
     },
     {
       "id": 43,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
       "views": 1013,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 29,
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
       "views": 830,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
     },
     {
       "id": 38,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
       "views": 1144,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 1,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
     },
     {
       "id": 42,
@@ -333,10 +333,10 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-does-precice-handle-data-mapping-for-non-matching-domain-decompositions/42",
       "created_at": "2019-10-10T19:28:48.005Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2019-10-10T19:40:04.456Z",
-      "views": 777,
+      "views": 778,
       "posts_count": 7,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
       "views": 765,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 2,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
       "views": 659,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
     }
   ]
 }

assets/data/news.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "generated_at": "2026-06-17T10:48:40.660508",
+  "generated_at": "2026-06-18T10:15:38.139684",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 217,
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2026-04-23T10:59:00.361Z",
       "like_count": 9,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 176,
+      "views": 180,
       "description": "Summary: With preCICE v3.4, we pushed features on several fronts. We made quasi-Newton acceleration bounds-aware as a first step toward fully supporting bounded coupling variables, such as density or volume..."
     },
     {
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-10-22T10:52:31.506Z",
       "like_count": 7,
       "posts_count": 4,
-      "views": 356,
+      "views": 360,
       "description": "Dear preCICE community, Some of you are already experimenting with just\u2011in\u2011time data mapping and other features introduced in preCICE v3.2. In my recently completed thesis, Flexible mesh\u2011particle coupling with preCICE,..."
     },
     {
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-05-06T06:24:30.728Z",
       "like_count": 8,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 149,
+      "views": 150,
       "description": "Dear preCICE community, We are happy to share the final publication of our research article titled \u201cEfficient Partition-of-Unity Radial-Basis-Function Interpolation for Coupled Problems\u201d in the SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing...."
     },
     {
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-04-07T04:59:59.909Z",
       "like_count": 4,
       "posts_count": 4,
-      "views": 216,
+      "views": 220,
       "description": "Summary: We have been developing a JSON schema for preCICE adapters and tools improving interoperability and enabling tooling support. Find out more about the schema and what you can do..."
     },
     {
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2025-04-02T13:13:39.707Z",
       "like_count": 3,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 250,
+      "views": 253,
       "description": "Summary: Important long-term features see great progress with the new release preCICE release v3.2, such as different options to handle dynamic meshes. Other features were finally wrapped up and integrated,..."
     },
     {
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2023-11-06T13:40:28.038Z",
       "like_count": 7,
       "posts_count": 2,
-      "views": 655,
+      "views": 656,
       "description": "Ah\u2026 that feeling of finally meeting the preCICE community in person and confirming how nice everyone is! precice2023-group-21200\u00d71200 318 KB The preCICE Workshop 2023 is long over, and we have..."
     },
     {
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2023-08-31T12:53:01.088Z",
       "like_count": 7,
       "posts_count": 1,
-      "views": 512,
+      "views": 514,
       "description": "Introduction Hello everyone , we\u2019d like to present our research project on improving the reproducibility of scientific software using Nix and NixOS. We (Simon and Max) are two students doing..."
     }
   ]