Replies: 2 comments
|
I started to work on
yes, why not?
yes, but perhaps checking parametric-conformity is a bit too much at runtime. As we discussed, we'd like to use some efficient sampling for basis-sharing splines. Perhaps, we can add simple switch (default is False) to indicate that we can use same base.
good point. I'd go with the latter, but I guess you are asking, because it can cause unbalanced load, especially if we support any combination of splines. Can think about this
Everything.
Depends, but short answer would be yes. |
0 replies
|
#161 removes SplineList and implements PyMultiPatch |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Overview
@j042 recently introduced
SplineListas a way to access splinepy-splines in list form from c++ directly. I would like to provide a way to sample these efficiently, maybe even provide a connectivity for multipatch objects. This is also useful for Multipatch objects.Questions:
Please let me know what you think
All reactions