# Feature Request ## Summary clap 3.0 integrated structopts (https://github.com/clap-rs/clap#quick-example) and I wonder if it makes sense to have clap 3.0 integration in paw. ## Motivation It seems that clap is more actively maintained, so it might be better to follow it. ## Guide-level explanation It is just another option to structopt. ## Reference-level explanation The integration should be defined by an optional feature, so it will play well with the existing integrations (structopt). ## Drawbacks It is one extra integration dependency, which makes things hard to maintain. ## Rationale and alternatives We can just ignore clap 3.0 as it seems that structopt is good enough. ## Unresolved Questions Is it worth the trouble?
Feature Request
Summary
clap 3.0 integrated structopts (https://github.com/clap-rs/clap#quick-example) and I wonder if it makes sense to have clap 3.0 integration in paw.
Motivation
It seems that clap is more actively maintained, so it might be better to follow it.
Guide-level explanation
It is just another option to structopt.
Reference-level explanation
The integration should be defined by an optional feature, so it will play well with the existing integrations (structopt).
Drawbacks
It is one extra integration dependency, which makes things hard to maintain.
Rationale and alternatives
We can just ignore clap 3.0 as it seems that structopt is good enough.
Unresolved Questions
Is it worth the trouble?