Build a U.S. industrial acquisition model that reflects lease structure, rollover, downtime, TI, LC, and functional competitiveness.
Use this skill when you have industrial rent roll, lease, market, and building data and need a base-case underwriting model. It is the right starting point for acquisitions where the return profile depends on lease durability, release assumptions, and capital requirements rather than on a simple stabilized rent-roll snapshot.
- Current lease roster or rent roll
- Lease structure summary
- Market rent context
- Building subtype and specs
- Purchase price and hold period
- Financing assumptions if available
- CapEx and competitiveness-upgrade view if available
- Any known rollover, release, or re-tenanting thesis
Build a defensible industrial underwriting model that separates contractual income from market assumptions and explicitly models rollover, downtime, TI, LC, capital needs, and exit risk.
Calculate:
- contractual base rent
- reimbursements
- temporary abatements
- known step-ups
- non-recoverable operating costs
Map:
- WALT
- annual rollover
- major tenant expirations
- options that may alter rollover
For each major rollover:
- estimate downtime
- estimate TI
- estimate LC
- estimate market rent vs in-place rent
- state whether space requires spec upgrades or reconfiguration
Separate:
- reimbursable expenses
- leakage or non-recoverable costs
- management / overhead
- reserves and recurring capital
Include:
- immediate repairs
- near-term replacements
- competitiveness upgrades
- tenant-specific capital tied to rollovers
Model:
- financing assumptions
- debt service or interest burden
- exit cap assumption
- expected disposition story:
- stabilized
- transitional
- partially re-tenanted
Conclude whether the base case depends primarily on:
- durable in-place income
- market-rent capture
- successful re-tenanting
- CapEx-led repositioning
# Industrial Underwriting Model
## Property:
## Status: PASS | FAIL | MARGINAL
### Base Assumptions
- Subtype:
- Hold Period:
- Financing:
- Exit Cap:
### In-Place Cash Flow
- Base Rent:
- Reimbursements:
- Non-Recoverable Expenses:
- NOI:
### Lease Risk
- WALT:
- Major Rollover Years:
- Concentration:
### Release Assumptions
- Downtime:
- TI:
- LC:
- Market Rent View:
### Capital Plan
- Immediate Repairs:
- Near-Term Replacements:
- Competitiveness Upgrades:
### Returns Summary
- Going-In Yield:
- Stabilized Yield:
- Base-Case IRR:
- Equity Multiple:
### Key Risks
- ...
### Verdict
PASS | MARGINAL | FAIL
### Confidence Level
HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW- Contractual revenue is separated from market-rent assumptions
- Rollover is explicitly modeled rather than buried in growth
- TI and LC are not omitted
- Recoveries and leakage are handled explicitly
- CapEx is separated from routine operating costs
- If reimbursements are unclear, underwrite conservatively
- If TI / LC market data is missing, state directional assumptions and lower confidence
- If the lease roster is incomplete, identify which tenants or terms create the greatest model sensitivity
| Level | Criteria |
|---|---|
| HIGH | Lease roster, market rent, CapEx, and recovery structure are all clear |
| MEDIUM | Core rent and market data available, but some release-cost assumptions estimated |
| LOW | Significant lease or building-capital uncertainty remains |