2.0.2 Assembly Version Is Wrong? #387
Unanswered
alecrodden
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
|
The version numbers actually conform to the guidelines. Please see the following documentation https://learn.microsoft.com/en-ca/dotnet/standard/library-guidance/versioning#version-numbers |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
After upgrading to SixLabors.Fonts version 2.0.2, I noticed that
typeof(SixLabors.Fonts.TextMeasurer).Assembly.GetName().Versionis still returning 2.0.0. Here's the assembly info from dotPeek, where the file version is correct, but the assembly name still says 2.0.0:This isn't a huge deal for me, I just noticed it because my application happens to include this library's assembly version in the metadata of a generated PDF for debugging purposes.
All reactions