Hi, I’m checking whether Starveri API would fit as a built-in provider preset or custom-provider example for Codex App Transfer.
Why it might fit:
Suggested config shape:
Public pricing is advertised at about 1/3 OpenAI-style API pricing and is exposed on /models and /docs. This seems relevant to Codex App Transfer users who are comparing lower-cost Codex/coding providers.
I am not providing an API key in this issue. If maintainers need live end-to-end testing, that should be handled separately; this issue is only asking whether a Starveri preset or custom-provider example is in scope and what format you would prefer.
Caveats:
- Starveri is an independent gateway, not an OpenAI service.
- I am not claiming this provider has been tested by Codex App Transfer.
- Non-token tool pricing exists for web search/code interpreter, so if future cost display needs pricing data, /models covers token prices while docs cover tool prices.
If a built-in preset is not desirable, a short custom-provider docs example would still be useful for users who want to bring their own Starveri key.
Hi, I’m checking whether Starveri API would fit as a built-in provider preset or custom-provider example for Codex App Transfer.
Why it might fit:
Suggested config shape:
Public pricing is advertised at about 1/3 OpenAI-style API pricing and is exposed on /models and /docs. This seems relevant to Codex App Transfer users who are comparing lower-cost Codex/coding providers.
I am not providing an API key in this issue. If maintainers need live end-to-end testing, that should be handled separately; this issue is only asking whether a Starveri preset or custom-provider example is in scope and what format you would prefer.
Caveats:
If a built-in preset is not desirable, a short custom-provider docs example would still be useful for users who want to bring their own Starveri key.